Fairbairn Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 48 minutes ago, vanderark14 said: There are more issues surrounding var. Incorrect decisions aside. The game between Aberdeen and Motherwell on Wednesday was a disgrace. Each aberdeen goal was checked, one of them took 3 minutes to check which diluted the celebrations of the goal. Aberdeen v Celtic, celtic player more than 2 yards offside, there is 0 need for a review yet VAR checked it. There is also not consistency in when certain incidents are checked. For example Tugs on shirts are checked sometimes but not always. Why not? i'm sure there are tonnes of examples in other games which every fan could come up with. Well there are 13 errors that they're admitting to in that report alone. That one just stood out to me due to the amount of opportunities they had to get it right before finally admitting it was wrong (when it's far too late). I actually feel sorry for the ref who got it right first time and was then put in a position where he is doubting his decision and sent down the wrong path. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 2 hours ago, LoganRoy said: May well have contributed to his exit? I think being pish played a significant part in that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Rubble Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 12 hours ago, Fairbairn said: Well there are 13 errors that they're admitting to in that report alone. That one just stood out to me due to the amount of opportunities they had to get it right before finally admitting it was wrong (when it's far too late). I actually feel sorry for the ref who got it right first time and was then put in a position where he is doubting his decision and sent down the wrong path. This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandydunn Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 18 hours ago, Fairbairn said: Well there are 13 errors that they're admitting to in that report alone. That one just stood out to me due to the amount of opportunities they had to get it right before finally admitting it was wrong (when it's far too late). I actually feel sorry for the ref who got it right first time and was then put in a position where he is doubting his decision and sent down the wrong path. The Marley Watkins assault after 5 seconds at pittodrie wasn’t even looked at, so that in the street and you could be looking at prison time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanderark14 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Var checking both goals at Pittodrie again. I can Almost see why they checked the dons goal but there was no need to check the hibs goal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan cake Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 1 hour ago, dan cake said: That was a shoulder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger intae them Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Which two teams does Penicuik hibs think get a benefit from var? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDFH64 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 2 goals went to var but this punch on Miovski didn’t, Miovski needed a couple of minutes treatment, that’s the sort of thing var should be checking 🤬 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddardStark Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 I think we can say VAR done it’s job here. https://x.com/SkySportsPL/status/1759221045129625602?s=20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanderark14 Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 1 hour ago, EddardStark said: I think we can say VAR done it’s job here. https://x.com/SkySportsPL/status/1759221045129625602?s=20 Definitely His protests 😆 🤣 when he knows there's 100 cameras on him 😆 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan cake Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 22 hours ago, Orraloon said: That was a shoulder. 😆 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ramy 1314 Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 Handball in box not given. Not even reviewed. Disgrace from the officials... Clearly out to stop us... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ramy 1314 Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 Boooooooooooooooooooooom !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ramy 1314 Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 And another Boooooooooooom !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ramy 1314 Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 Never in doubt !!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanderark14 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 That penalty for hearts......and clancy gave it after reviewing it ont the screen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Some terrible decisions at Rugby Park too. Looked to me like Killie should have had another penalty and we should probably have had one too for handball. Ref not sent to the screen for either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 8 minutes ago, Fairbairn said: Some terrible decisions at Rugby Park too. Looked to me like Killie should have had another penalty and we should probably have had one too for handball. Ref not sent to the screen for either. And another! If that’s not worth another look for handball by Mayo I don’t know what is. The decisions are getting worse with every passing week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan cake Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Hertz penalty 😆 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 23 minutes ago, dan cake said: Hertz penalty 😆 We seem to be in a place now where any contact in the box is deemed a penalty. It’s ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 1 hour ago, vanderark14 said: That penalty for hearts......and clancy gave it after reviewing it ont the screen. It's mental 1 hour ago, Fairbairn said: Some terrible decisions at Rugby Park too. Looked to me like Killie should have had another penalty and we should probably have had one too for handball. Ref not sent to the screen for either. 1 hour ago, Fairbairn said: And another! If that’s not worth another look for handball by Mayo I don’t know what is. The decisions are getting worse with every passing week. Yep agree with both posts, Killie should have had a second and rangers should have had at least 1 of those if not both, especially considering the one killie did get. No consistency at all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Scot Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 31 minutes ago, Fairbairn said: We seem to be in a place now where any contact in the box is deemed a penalty. It’s ridiculous. I heard it on the radio, saw the comments on here and was expecting to see an absolute shocker but I can see why the penalty was given. The Hibs players has made an attempt for the ball, the Hearts guy moves the ball and then the Hibs guy connects with the Hearts player. Its probably a foul outside the box and therefore can see why its a penalty. The problem is most people have grown up at a time when penaltys had to be more than just fouled. They had to be over and above because they are effrctively a goal. With VAR and the new way of reffing the game, those days are gone. Similar to the Hibs penalty conceeded against Celtic a few weeks back where nobody was even claiming for a penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 4 hours ago, Diamond Scot said: I heard it on the radio, saw the comments on here and was expecting to see an absolute shocker but I can see why the penalty was given. The Hibs players has made an attempt for the ball, the Hearts guy moves the ball and then the Hibs guy connects with the Hearts player. Its probably a foul outside the box and therefore can see why its a penalty. The problem is most people have grown up at a time when penaltys had to be more than just fouled. They had to be over and above because they are effrctively a goal. With VAR and the new way of reffing the game, those days are gone. Similar to the Hibs penalty conceeded against Celtic a few weeks back where nobody was even claiming for a penalty. Away and don't talk pish, it's never a penalty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Scot Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 3 hours ago, Kirk said: Away and don't talk pish, it's never a penalty I never said it was a penalty. I said I can understand why it was given. Especially the way the game is being officiated these days. What part of what I said was inaccurate? Did the Hibs player go for the ball? Yes, did he get the ball? No, Did the Hearts player move the ball out of the way. Yes. Did the Hibs player then connect with the Hearts players leg / foot? Yes. The only part thats poor is the contact isnt enough to make the Hearts player go down but that could be said of alot of penalties these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.5eeaf0fbe501ba3c868c32fd77caef1f.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.