AberdeenAngus Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 The doctor/medic thing today was brilliant karma with 2 players needing treatment simultaneously. Apparently a City fan with a ticket near to the Chelsea dugout turned up with wearing a white coat and stethoscope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Col Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 saw this on the bbc sport twitter feed, Last 6 League defeats for #CFC: Pulis, Poyet, Pardew, Pochettino, Pulis, Pellegrini Next 2 games: Pulis & Pardew. Pulis seems to be the Chelsea bogeyman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringo Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 (edited) saw this on the bbc sport twitter feed, Last 6 League defeats for #CFC: Pulis, Poyet, Pardew, Pochettino, Pulis, Pellegrini Next 2 games: Pulis & Pardew. Pulis seems to be the Chelsea bogeyman. Or anyone with a P ? Edited August 16, 2015 by fringo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringo Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Apparently a City fan with a ticket near to the Chelsea dugout turned up with wearing a white coat and stethoscope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Mourinho's bawbagedness once again exposed itself yesterday where he claimed that it was a "fake result". Feck know what that means as the parts i saw, City pumped Chelsea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnie x Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Mourinho's bawbagedness once again exposed itself yesterday where he claimed that it was a "fake result". Feck know what that means as the parts i saw, City pumped Chelsea. The first half was a figment of everyones imagination. It didn't happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Haha what a bellend So City miss numerous chances but because Chelsea had a brief spell of dominance in the second half and missed one great chance it's a "fake result" Always entertaining Jose, especially in defeat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Haha what a bellend So City miss numerous chances but because Chelsea had a brief spell of dominance in the second half and missed one great chance it's a "fake result" Always entertaining Jose, especially in defeat If it was anyone else who said that Mourinho would say that their comments were that of a loser or someone who can't accept defeat. He's a total whank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 He's really good at it though, how many words were printed last week about Chelsea's tactics, or them losing a game they should've won? Not many, it was all about the physio fall out. All about deflection... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan cake Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 He's really good at it though, how many words were printed last week about Chelsea's tactics, or them losing a game they should've won? Not many, it was all about the physio fall out. All about deflection... indeed, genius at work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan cake Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 and a great guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossy Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Surely I can't be the only one thinking that one day he'll make a brilliant Celtic manager ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 He's really good at it though, how many words were printed last week about Chelsea's tactics, or them losing a game they should've won? Not many, it was all about the physio fall out. All about deflection... I think that's backfired though, the media fallout out from that if anything is worse than drawing one game because of poor tactics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASTA Mick Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Surely I can't be the only one thinking that one day he'll make a brilliant Celtic manager ? Yes, yes you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossy Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Yes, yes you are. I think you'd be a perfect match. Take it as a compliment.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 I think that's backfired though, the media fallout out from that if anything is worse than drawing one game because of poor tactics. Yeah, he's probably taken it too far, especially as it's made him look a complete dick! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Posted August 17, 2015 Share Posted August 17, 2015 Did they have no medical team at all at the weekend then? i saw citys guys had to treat them. they should have just said no, then again even with them helping the chelseas players they still got pumped Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 What's happening to the female doctor compared to the male one is crazy, gives you an insight into the difference in Gender treatment. It's most egregious what is happening to her. Also this isn't "deflection" tactics from Jose he's just has sociopath tendencies. as i said earlier in the thread. Things weren't going the way he wanted so illogically blamed a medic who had been summoned onto the pitch by the referee. He is not part of that decision making process. He threw a tantrum not a calculated "genius" move. He does this shit all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgowmancity Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 Did they have no medical team at all at the weekend then? i saw citys guys had to treat them. they should have just said no, then again even with them helping the chelseas players they still got pumped They did have - the guy that looked like Clare Balding The only reason the City physio was on was because there were 2 players requiring treatment at the same time (Cahill & Costa) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 What's happening to the female doctor compared to the male one is crazy, gives you an insight into the difference in Gender treatment. What difference, what are you talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 What difference, what are you talking about? Rather than type anymore i'll just post an article i read Daniel Storey of Football365 'I really didn't want to have to do this, but The Sun On Sunday's 'exposé' of Dr Eva Carneiro was such a cheap and despicable slur that I really didn't have any choice. Even if it is exactly what Mourinho wanted, the internal conflict between Chelsea's manager and the club's medical staff led the agenda in the build-up to the game. Firstly, it is important to say that Carneiro and Jon Fearn did little, if anything, wrong last Saturday. Footage indicates that they were called on by the referee, and possibly by Eden Hazard too. Their responsibility is not to the game situation, but to the physical well-being of the players. Both acted to the best of their (substantial) ability and medical training. One could forgive Mourinho for his classic attention deflection trick in the post-match fallout when feelings were running high, but his decision to throw his colleagues under the bus leaves a sour taste, as does the decision to ban Carneiro and Fearn from the bench for Sunday's match. His insistence that they could return and his own brief admission of guilt ("I make mistakes") on Friday at least suggests that the situation is repairable. However, it is the reaction to the incident (in some quarters) that has been the most unpleasant. Writing for ONE World Sports, Duncan Castles said that having a woman around the players may 'affect the dressing room dynamic' at Chelsea, as if they are all mouth-breathers who cannot prevent themselves getting erect when within five yards of a female. The Daily Mail's 'Who Is Eva Carneiro?' feature was also poor, as if it somehow mattered whether a medical professional has 'pre-Raphaelite curls and toned figure' or not. 'She is pictured tucking into an iced cupcake while another shows her love of horse-riding as she canters in what looks like a safari setting', that article informed the reader. Well whoop-de-f**king-doo. The straw that broke this football writer's back was that Sun on Sunday piece, however, in which an 'ex-lover' of Carneiro described how she 'loved sex' and 'drank wine', under the pretence that this was anything other than a thinly-veiled character assassination. Adult enjoys consensual sexual intercourse? Well why the hell didn't someone tell me earlier? I feel stupid for defending her now. Initially I thought I had Carneiro's rap sheet sorted. Her crimes were 1) Carrying out her job correctly, 2) Expressing gratitude to those who had supported her and 3) Being in a long-term relationship (apparently with a s**t who would sell his story to the press). Throw away the key, jailer. Hanging's too good for her. But actually, Carneiro is guilty of a far more serious football crime: Being a woman. Ask yourself this: How much do you know about Jon Fearn? What historical era is his haircut from? How many times a week does he have a w**k? Does he love horse-riding? Exactly, you don't know. To be a woman in football, despite the significant strides made, is to be at a disadvantage. You are fair game, an easy target. The best you can hope for on matchday is to be judged differently to a man in your same position whilst having thousands of ignorant morons shouting at you to show them your breasts. The moment things go awry, a small but dangerous minority will look to victimise you and sensationalise your (frankly dull) past actions. Be considered attractive and you will be labelled 'sultry' and 'sexy', be considered unattractive and the abuse will be far more derogatory. This has to stop. A trained medical professional has been reduced to the status of object for the hungry masses to feast upon, and it stinks. There will be those reading this who feel it has no place in an article about Manchester City vs Chelsea, but the Chelsea manager (and the subsequent reaction) decreed that it does, not me. For women like Eva Carneiro, the ideal scenario in football is for you to be invisible. Just imagine how belittling that feels. If that's not a status quo worth highlighting, I don't know what is.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usainboltyarocket Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 I think you'd be a perfect match. Take it as a compliment.... I think Guardiola would be a better match tbh. I also think the two orange Jimmy's are a perfect match for the Brit teuchtars. Hopefully they will be back one day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacWalka Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 Rather than type anymore i'll just post an article i read Daniel Storey of Football365 'I really didn't want to have to do this, but The Sun On Sunday's 'exposé' of Dr Eva Carneiro was such a cheap and despicable slur that I really didn't have any choice. Even if it is exactly what Mourinho wanted, the internal conflict between Chelsea's manager and the club's medical staff led the agenda in the build-up to the game. Firstly, it is important to say that Carneiro and Jon Fearn did little, if anything, wrong last Saturday. Footage indicates that they were called on by the referee, and possibly by Eden Hazard too. Their responsibility is not to the game situation, but to the physical well-being of the players. Both acted to the best of their (substantial) ability and medical training. One could forgive Mourinho for his classic attention deflection trick in the post-match fallout when feelings were running high, but his decision to throw his colleagues under the bus leaves a sour taste, as does the decision to ban Carneiro and Fearn from the bench for Sunday's match. His insistence that they could return and his own brief admission of guilt ("I make mistakes") on Friday at least suggests that the situation is repairable. However, it is the reaction to the incident (in some quarters) that has been the most unpleasant. Writing for ONE World Sports, Duncan Castles said that having a woman around the players may 'affect the dressing room dynamic' at Chelsea, as if they are all mouth-breathers who cannot prevent themselves getting erect when within five yards of a female. The Daily Mail's 'Who Is Eva Carneiro?' feature was also poor, as if it somehow mattered whether a medical professional has 'pre-Raphaelite curls and toned figure' or not. 'She is pictured tucking into an iced cupcake while another shows her love of horse-riding as she canters in what looks like a safari setting', that article informed the reader. Well whoop-de-f**king-doo. The straw that broke this football writer's back was that Sun on Sunday piece, however, in which an 'ex-lover' of Carneiro described how she 'loved sex' and 'drank wine', under the pretence that this was anything other than a thinly-veiled character assassination. Adult enjoys consensual sexual intercourse? Well why the hell didn't someone tell me earlier? I feel stupid for defending her now. Initially I thought I had Carneiro's rap sheet sorted. Her crimes were 1) Carrying out her job correctly, 2) Expressing gratitude to those who had supported her and 3) Being in a long-term relationship (apparently with a s**t who would sell his story to the press). Throw away the key, jailer. Hanging's too good for her. But actually, Carneiro is guilty of a far more serious football crime: Being a woman. Ask yourself this: How much do you know about Jon Fearn? What historical era is his haircut from? How many times a week does he have a w**k? Does he love horse-riding? Exactly, you don't know. To be a woman in football, despite the significant strides made, is to be at a disadvantage. You are fair game, an easy target. The best you can hope for on matchday is to be judged differently to a man in your same position whilst having thousands of ignorant morons shouting at you to show them your breasts. The moment things go awry, a small but dangerous minority will look to victimise you and sensationalise your (frankly dull) past actions. Be considered attractive and you will be labelled 'sultry' and 'sexy', be considered unattractive and the abuse will be far more derogatory. This has to stop. A trained medical professional has been reduced to the status of object for the hungry masses to feast upon, and it stinks. There will be those reading this who feel it has no place in an article about Manchester City vs Chelsea, but the Chelsea manager (and the subsequent reaction) decreed that it does, not me. For women like Eva Carneiro, the ideal scenario in football is for you to be invisible. Just imagine how belittling that feels. If that's not a status quo worth highlighting, I don't know what is.' That's a very good article. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 Rather than type anymore i'll just post an article i read Daniel Storey of Football365 'I really didn't want to have to do this, but The Sun On Sunday's 'exposé' of Dr Eva Carneiro was such a cheap and despicable slur that I really didn't have any choice. Even if it is exactly what Mourinho wanted, the internal conflict between Chelsea's manager and the club's medical staff led the agenda in the build-up to the game. Firstly, it is important to say that Carneiro and Jon Fearn did little, if anything, wrong last Saturday. Footage indicates that they were called on by the referee, and possibly by Eden Hazard too. Their responsibility is not to the game situation, but to the physical well-being of the players. Both acted to the best of their (substantial) ability and medical training. One could forgive Mourinho for his classic attention deflection trick in the post-match fallout when feelings were running high, but his decision to throw his colleagues under the bus leaves a sour taste, as does the decision to ban Carneiro and Fearn from the bench for Sunday's match. His insistence that they could return and his own brief admission of guilt ("I make mistakes") on Friday at least suggests that the situation is repairable. However, it is the reaction to the incident (in some quarters) that has been the most unpleasant. Writing for ONE World Sports, Duncan Castles said that having a woman around the players may 'affect the dressing room dynamic' at Chelsea, as if they are all mouth-breathers who cannot prevent themselves getting erect when within five yards of a female. The Daily Mail's 'Who Is Eva Carneiro?' feature was also poor, as if it somehow mattered whether a medical professional has 'pre-Raphaelite curls and toned figure' or not. 'She is pictured tucking into an iced cupcake while another shows her love of horse-riding as she canters in what looks like a safari setting', that article informed the reader. Well whoop-de-f**king-doo. The straw that broke this football writer's back was that Sun on Sunday piece, however, in which an 'ex-lover' of Carneiro described how she 'loved sex' and 'drank wine', under the pretence that this was anything other than a thinly-veiled character assassination. Adult enjoys consensual sexual intercourse? Well why the hell didn't someone tell me earlier? I feel stupid for defending her now. Initially I thought I had Carneiro's rap sheet sorted. Her crimes were 1) Carrying out her job correctly, 2) Expressing gratitude to those who had supported her and 3) Being in a long-term relationship (apparently with a s**t who would sell his story to the press). Throw away the key, jailer. Hanging's too good for her. But actually, Carneiro is guilty of a far more serious football crime: Being a woman. Ask yourself this: How much do you know about Jon Fearn? What historical era is his haircut from? How many times a week does he have a w**k? Does he love horse-riding? Exactly, you don't know. To be a woman in football, despite the significant strides made, is to be at a disadvantage. You are fair game, an easy target. The best you can hope for on matchday is to be judged differently to a man in your same position whilst having thousands of ignorant morons shouting at you to show them your breasts. The moment things go awry, a small but dangerous minority will look to victimise you and sensationalise your (frankly dull) past actions. Be considered attractive and you will be labelled 'sultry' and 'sexy', be considered unattractive and the abuse will be far more derogatory. This has to stop. A trained medical professional has been reduced to the status of object for the hungry masses to feast upon, and it stinks. There will be those reading this who feel it has no place in an article about Manchester City vs Chelsea, but the Chelsea manager (and the subsequent reaction) decreed that it does, not me. For women like Eva Carneiro, the ideal scenario in football is for you to be invisible. Just imagine how belittling that feels. If that's not a status quo worth highlighting, I don't know what is.' That's fair enough, the way you phrased the original comment made it sound as though it was Mourinho and Chelsea that was demonstrating gender bias. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 18, 2015 Share Posted August 18, 2015 That's fair enough, the way you phrased the original comment made it sound as though it was Mourinho and Chelsea that was demonstrating gender bias. Nah I was going to type out more but couldn't be arsed, so probably wasn't clear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.