kumnio Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Great, many months of this shite again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErsatzThistle Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 BBC presenters bouncing with excitement at this news. Can see Billy and Kate having three or four more kids to be had at our expense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilser Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Call me a cynic but it's a remarkably conveniently timed announcement... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex-Whitfield Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Now that is desperation!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hessen Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 I believe you can only announce a prospective new baby when the mother is actually pregnant...just a coincidence. Wonder what they will call it, they have used up all the good unionist names! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilser Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 I believe you can only announce a prospective new baby when the mother is actually pregnant...just a coincidence. Wonder what they will call it, they have used up all the good unionist names! Aye, but once the mother is pregnant you can still choose when to announce it i.e. before or after 18 September... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hessen Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 True, how far gone is she? Do we know if they announced the last pregnancy at the same period? Will they induce birth so it happens at 17:07 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 witness the hysterical press coverage which will obviously push the small matter of Scottish independence into second place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Jeez there are some cynical people on this board! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilser Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 (edited) True, how far gone is she? Do we know if they announced the last pregnancy at the same period? Will they induce birth so it happens at 17:07 From the Daily Mail: Sources have told Mail Online that the Duchess has not yet even reached her crucial 12-week stage and were once again forced to reveal details of the new baby because of her condition. 'The Queen and members of both families are delighted with the news' Kensington Palace A senior royal source said: ‘The couple only found out very recently. The Duchess has not even reached the crucial 12-week stage. 'But when it became apparent that she was no well enough to join the Duke on a joint engagement in Oxford today and that the number of forthcoming engagements could be affected, the Duke and Duchess have taken the difficult decision to be fully open about the pregnancy. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2747642/BREAKING-NEWS-Duchess-Cambridge-pregnant-second-child.html#ixzz3CiezTXgh Last time round they came out with the announcement before the 12 week stage but she'd been admitted to hospital. No mention of a hospital admission this time. Draw your own conclusions...I sense a spin doctor in the background. Edited September 8, 2014 by neilser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brant grebner Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 So he jizzed in her last night Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 witness the hysterical press coverage which will obviously push the small matter of Scottish independence into second place. I actually think that is good. The less influence the press have on the referendum campaign the better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Pair Wullie must have been under some pressure to time it just right. I wonder if they were under instructions as to when to go for it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Saint Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 You can't now vote Yes or you'll be leaving this poor defenceless little baby to grow up in a broken RUK. If you care about kids, you'll vote No, remember. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giblet Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Everybody knows having a kid doesn't save a loveless marriage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 You can't now vote Yes or you'll be leaving this poor defenceless little baby to grow up in a broken RUK. If you care about kids, you'll vote No, remember. I'm trying to work out if this helps or hinders the YES campaign. Probably about neutral overall. If they could manufacture a miscarriage in about 7 days time they might help get out the sympathy vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Edinburgh Zoo should consider giving William a crack at the lady panda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brant grebner Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 With his family background, he'd just bugger a manservant in front of it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDange Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 I genuinely thought they would marry off Price Harry in Scotland to get another Royal Wedding just before the vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hessen Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 They are naming it William Wallace Windsor....just a coincidence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoltanBuchan Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 I genuinely thought they would marry off Price Harry in Scotland to get another Royal Wedding just before the vote. 2 years ago my mum was telling anyone who would listen to expect a summer 2014 wedding for Harry! Looks like her (conspiracy?) theory didn't pan out, but this isn't a million miles away; announcing a pregnancy - any pregnancy, Royal or other - before 12 weeks is extremely unusual, maybe even frowned upon. The paranoid cynic in me is inclined to think think that Kate's been 'encouraged' to go public with the news earlier than she'd maybe have liked. Edinburgh Zoo should consider giving William a crack at the lady panda. Give this guy a go.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eqUtK61SOs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 From the Daily Mail: Last time round they came out with the announcement before the 12 week stage but she'd been admitted to hospital. No mention of a hospital admission this time. Draw your own conclusions...I sense a spin doctor in the background. I seriously hope youre joking. She suffers from severe morning sickness. My wife had the same. There's a medical term but it basically means being unable to eat without throwing up and even the smell of food can bring it on. My wife was hospitalised with the first one but not with the 2nd, however she was effectively bed ridden. Sounds like this girl is much the same. It's not a laughing matter and can threaten both the mother and babies health. As an example my wife lost 4st with the 2nd pregnancy and that was her a bit better! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErsatzThistle Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 (edited) Oh FFS the Unionists are now going absolutely mental because of that awfully bad man Alex Salmond once again. He congratulated Billyand Kate on the kid by calling them both by their Scottish titles, Earl & Countess of Strathearn, and this somehow is a huge insult to the royal family on his part . Feck the royal family a thousand times over. Republic of Scotland is the way to go Edited September 8, 2014 by ErsatzThistle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde1998 Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 It's just a baby. Get over it BBC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brant grebner Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 It's just a foetus . Get over it BBC. Fixed that for you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.5eeaf0fbe501ba3c868c32fd77caef1f.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.