thplinth Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 (edited) It is an interesting place, Antarctica. What could this be I wonder... a massive concentration / object sitting in what is thought to be a massive crater. https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/2489440/satellite-spots-massive-object-hidden-under-the-frozen-wastes-of-antarctica http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060529/full/news060529-11.html Edited September 13, 2017 by thplinth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 I've skipped most of this thread as, quite frankly, it's nonsense however Scotty if you don't mind (and it hasn't been answered elsewhere in the thread) I'd like to ask a question. if the Earth is flat as you say, why do so many people peddle the "myth" that it's not? What's to be gained from this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 21 minutes ago, thplinth said: It is an interesting place, Antarctica. What could this be I wonder... a massive concentration / object sitting in what is thought to be a massive crater. https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/2489440/satellite-spots-massive-object-hidden-under-the-frozen-wastes-of-antarctica http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060529/full/news060529-11.html My dream holiday (which i think isn't possible soon, cause of changes to the treaty of antartica) was Argentina to New Zeland via Antartica, weddel sea,ross sea or the vice versa route. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northernscum Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Fairbairn said: I've skipped most of this thread as, quite frankly, it's nonsense however Scotty if you don't mind (and it hasn't been answered elsewhere in the thread) I'd like to ask a question. if the Earth is flat as you say, why do so many people peddle the "myth" that it's not? What's to be gained from this? This is exactly what I have been wondering! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 2 hours ago, Scotty CTA said: The flat earth geocentric model works. No it doesn't. As thplinth asked, how do you get day and night with a spotlight sun that never rises or sets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlueGaz Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Toepoke said: No it doesn't. As thplinth asked, how do you get day and night with a spotlight sun that never rises or sets? God using electricity these days? Simples. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnyTJS Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Fairbairn said: I've skipped most of this thread as, quite frankly, it's nonsense however Scotty if you don't mind (and it hasn't been answered elsewhere in the thread) I'd like to ask a question. if the Earth is flat as you say, why do so many people peddle the "myth" that it's not? What's to be gained from this? 18 minutes ago, northernscum said: This is exactly what I have been wondering! A couple of pages back, in reply to Kumio asking who gains from the myth of a spherical earth: On 9/11/2017 at 5:05 PM, Scotty CTA said: The enemy. The only explanation for a flat stationary earth with the sun and moon orbiting it would be special creation. No big bang, and no evolution. Telling us that we are just a 'random' speck in an expanding universe on a planet that orbits a sun very cleverly hides God. Satan doesn't want us to know about and be reconciled to God (hence the deception). Which begs a number of questions. If Satan has the power to control all scientists into formulating theories that 'hide God' from the rest of us poor saps, why doesn't the evil one just control the non-scientists too? Are astro-physicists particularly susceptible to Satanic influence? Big Bang is an interpretation of the equations upon which Einstein built his general theory of relativity. The maths shows that the universe must be dynamic, either contracting or expanding (since, like most mathematical equations, they can be read both ways). Einstein believed that the universe was stable and was neither expanding or contracting (since the technology didn't exist at that time to show that light from distant galaxies was red-shifted). So Einstein added a constant (effectively 'mass') to the equations of general relativity to make them predict stability. The biggest mistake he ever made, so he claimed once Hubble showed red-shift. Now, why would Satan bollock about to such an extent? Got to go out, but I'm sure you can see plenty of other questions that are going begging if all Science of the past few centuries is Satan's attempt to hide God ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northernscum Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, DonnyTJS said: A couple of pages back, in reply to Kumio asking who gains from the myth of a spherical earth: Which begs a number of questions. If Satan has the power to control all scientists into formulating theories that 'hide God' from the rest of us poor saps, why doesn't the evil one just control the non-scientists too? Are astro-physicists particularly susceptible to Satanic influence? Big Bang is an interpretation of the equations upon which Einstein built his general theory of relativity. The maths shows that the universe must be dynamic, either contracting or expanding (since, like most mathematical equations, they can be read both ways). Einstein believed that the universe was stable and was neither expanding or contracting (since the technology didn't exist at that time to show that light from distant galaxies was red-shifted). So Einstein added a constant (effectively 'mass') to the equations of general relativity to make them predict stability. The biggest mistake he ever made, so he claimed once Hubble showed red-shift. Now, why would Satan bollock about to such an extent? Got to go out, but I'm sure you can see plenty of other questions that are going begging if all Science of the past few centuries is Satan's attempt to hide God ... I am beginning to think this thread is Beelzebubs invention to distract us all from the impending doom of the TAMBs non existence. Clever that he is! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted September 13, 2017 Share Posted September 13, 2017 53 minutes ago, northernscum said: I am beginning to think this thread is Beelzebubs invention to distract us all from the impending doom of the TAMBs non existence. Clever that he is! I'm starting to think that the TAMB might be a study on dementia? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffer Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 No replies to my direct science answers, you'll note. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flat Earth Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Science is just our way of hiding Satan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted September 14, 2017 Author Share Posted September 14, 2017 https://www.globalresearch.ca/why-i-dont-speak-of-911-anymore-2/5608785 Some interesting views here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted September 14, 2017 Author Share Posted September 14, 2017 https://www.globalresearch.ca/9-11-and-america-s-war-on-terrorism/24975 Think Al Qaeda then became Al-Nusra Front who the US is backing in Syria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 On 9/13/2017 at 4:37 AM, DonnyTJS said: If Satan has the power to control all scientists... Satan has the power to (and does) control all 'governments'. It is ultimately those 'governments' which decide/allow what gets taught through our education systems and released through the various medias. (For example, if I were to discover free and unlimited 'energy', I couldn't just announce it. I would just be a target for being discredited or death in the same way that so many have previously been black balled and have 'perished'.) On 9/13/2017 at 4:37 AM, DonnyTJS said: Big Bang is an interpretation of the equations upon which Einstein built his general theory of relativity. I don't subscribe to the theory of relativity, or believe that the Hubble telescope exists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 On 9/13/2017 at 2:56 AM, thplinth said: What could this be I wonder... Another made up story/distraction backed up by fake satellites and CGI? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 9 hours ago, Flat Earth said: Science is just our way of hiding Satan. Yep. Impossible to argue against. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 On 9/12/2017 at 4:23 AM, biffer said: Don't worry about it, everyone I work with or meet professionally must be in on it as well. Not if you understand 'compartmentalisation'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted September 14, 2017 Author Share Posted September 14, 2017 15 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: It is ultimately those 'governments' which decide/allow what gets taught through our education systems and released through the various medias. (For example, if I were to discover free and unlimited 'energy', I couldn't just announce it. I would just be a target for being discredited or death in the same way that so many have previously been black balled and have 'perished'.) Agree with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 (edited) On 9/12/2017 at 1:09 AM, biffer said: It's wrong. I can take a photo of the moon and its 300,000km away. So you have been led to believe. My question was how far away could we photograph on a flat earth? Edited September 14, 2017 by Scotty CTA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 On 9/13/2017 at 4:26 AM, Toepoke said: No it doesn't. As thplinth asked, how do you get day and night with a spotlight sun that never rises or sets? The model is shown in the last 17-18 seconds of this video below... On 9/11/2017 at 7:53 PM, Scotty CTA said: Snipers (and those in charge of aiming artillery fire) don't take the curvature of the earth into consideration (because they don't have to). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlueGaz Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 10 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: Snipers (and those in charge of aiming artillery fire) don't take the curvature of the earth into consideration (because they don't have to). Snipers do get taught the Coriolis effect, however the distance they normally shoot means the curvature of the earth is negligible in terms of margin for error, and one of the reasons artillery these days is far more accurate than it used to be is because modern systems take into account the curvature of the earth. In earlier, less technical systems with far lower range, the curvature of the earth was negligible. The further older, manual systems shot, the less accurate they were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Neither snipers, bridge builders, or layers of railway track take the 'curvature' of the earth into account (because they don't have to). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlueGaz Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: Neither snipers, bridge builders, or layers of railway track take the 'curvature' of the earth into account (because they don't have to) Snipers don't at shorter ranges, because they don't have to, that is correct. But at longer ranges, they can have up to a 3 inch margin that has to be taken into account - or so they are led to believe. Edited September 14, 2017 by BlueGaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4462675/barmy-flat-earther-conspiracist-takes-a-spirit-level-on-plane-in-bizarre-bid-to-prove-his-theory-but-theres-just-one-small-problem/ Looks like Scotty isn't the only loony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Scotty, educationally do you have any qualifications in science or mathematics, I mean anything from school, o grades, highers, or further education diplomas or degrees? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.