adamntg Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 Keith Jackson (I know) tweeting there's another twist. Stock market klaxon again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brant grebner Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Apparently one of the loan players has AIDS and knew about it before the deal went through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louch Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 I'm well aware of the history. Why do you think Craig Whyte was able to buy the club for 100p? It was on its knees long before Whyte arrived. 100p + 17 000 000 000 p of debt to take ownership of Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 100p + 17 000 000 000 p of debt to take ownership of No, the debt remained attributed to the company. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Apparently one of the loan players has AIDS and knew about it before the deal went through. In the paper today saying he has an undisclosed illness and won't play this season and knew about it prior to signing. Curiously enough he last played on the 2nd of February which was the day the loan deal was signed. The rumours are it's Hep C that he's got but it's been denied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scunnered Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Keith Jacksons an arse. I stayed up an hour later waiting to tear the heid off it and then this shite. Implications for Newcastle and the player perhaps, but won't affect The Rangers that I can see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Keith Jacksons an arse. I stayed up an hour later waiting to tear the heid off it and then this shite. Implications for Newcastle and the player perhaps, but won't affect The Rangers that I can see. Other than the fact that we're paying £4K per week for players that are unlikely to ever play for the club and that in the case of 3 of them their injuries/illnesses were known of prior to them signing. It's a stitch up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scunnered Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Other than the fact that we're paying £4K per week for players that are unlikely to ever play for the club and that in the case of 3 of them their injuries/illnesses were known of prior to them signing. It's a stitch up! Ach whats 4k a week in an eternal black hole of expenditure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Ach whats 4k a week in an eternal black hole of expenditure. A nights stay in a nice hotel just outside Montrose next time we play up there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TartanJon Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 4k is peanuts compared to Daniel Prodan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 4k is peanuts compared to Daniel Prodan That's the kinda thing that got us in to this mess! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angus_Young Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 4k is peanuts compared to Daniel Prodan -shudders- Please don't, I had just about got over that debacle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 He wasn't actually that bad! Excessive definitely, but he was a good striker that scored goals, it's just that it was impossible to justify the price tag for someone to score goals in the scoltish premier league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 He wasn't actually that bad! Excessive definitely, but he was a good striker that scored goals, it's just that it was impossible to justify the price tag for someone to score goals in the scoltish premier league. True, but he is a symbol of the buy now pay later mindset, plus was good fun to go round telling folk the "P" had fell off their top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 True, but he is a symbol of the buy now pay later mindset, plus was good fun to go round telling folk the "P" had fell off their top.I hadn't heard that one before. Actually gave me a laugh! ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 I hadn't heard that one before. Actually gave me a laugh! Bizarrely neither had I!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scunnered Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 True, but he is a symbol of the buy now pay later mindset, plus was good fun to go round telling folk the "P" had fell off their top. So obvious and yet I never thought of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mariokempes56 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Pflo ? I don't get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scunnered Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Pflo ? I don't get it. It's Norwegian for "diddy". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angus_Young Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Bizarrely neither had I!! Or me there were a lot of 'other' things I called him mind you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 It's Norwegian for "diddy".Unfair. It's Norwegian for "over priced but actually very efficient goal scorer".We had plenty of real diddies without making them up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) it's actually norwegian "a fool and his money is easily parted" Well except it was Bank of Scotland money which unbeknownst to us was actually secured against tax-payers money, so when Peter Cummings was making bad loans to Murray, who would have thought the people of Britain would be underwriting the whole enterprise. Edited March 27, 2015 by phart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 it's actually norwegian "a fool and his money is easily parted" It wasn't his money..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 It wasn't his money..... no, as it turns out it was the face painters and the rest... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.