Bbc Bias Enquiry - Anything Goes - Other topics not covered elsewhere - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Bbc Bias Enquiry


Recommended Posts

Stuart Cosgrove, despite working for the BBC, isn't afraid to call it as he sees it:

http://www.thedrum.com/news/2014/09/12/balance-failure-bbc-scottish-independence-referendum-coverage-wrong-and-not

He was very eloquent about his love for Scotalnd today on Off The Ball yesterday despite having Tam Cowan acting the clown while he was doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuart Cosgrove, despite working for the BBC, isn't afraid to call it as he sees it:

http://www.thedrum.com/news/2014/09/12/balance-failure-bbc-scottish-independence-referendum-coverage-wrong-and-not

He was very eloquent about his love for Scotalnd today on Off The Ball yesterday despite having Tam Cowan acting the clown while he was doing so.

"Our coverage of the referendum story is fair, accurate and impartial, in line with our editorial guidelines."

Perhaps their editorial guidelines are wrong. As Cosgrove says, maybe their method of assessing balance etc is wrong.

They are utterly in denial. They don't seem to be accountable to anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Robertson is back on the case:

https://archive.today/pDjJ9

Professor: BBC's Anti-Scottish Independence Bias Increases as Vote Draws Closer
GLASGOW, September 13 (RIA Novosti), Mark Hirst – BBC's anti-Scottish independence bias has increased, John Robertson, a Professor in Media Studies at the University of the West of Scotland told RIA Novosti on Saturday.
"My research indicates that our public broadcaster, funded as much by Yes as by No voters, has betrayed its charter on impartiality," Robertson said.
In January Prof. Robertson published the results of a year-long study of BBC political coverage and discovered that the British state broadcaster had, in its reporting, favored the No campaign by a ratio of 3 to 2.
Last week the academic applied the same methodology he had previously to a one-day sample of coverage by the BBC following the visit of all three UK party leaders to Scotland and an international media conference hosted by the pro-independence leader Alex Salmond.
"I applied the same research methods I had used before to measure objectively how fair the coverage had been," Prof. Robertson told RIA Novosti.
"Looking first at the total number of statements by presenters, politicians, business people and citizens supportive of the No campaign I then contrasted that with supporting statements for Yes and found the ratio of slightly more than 2 to 1 is more biased in favor of No than I had found in February," Prof. Robertson said.
"In February I had also found a tendency for anti-Yes statements to precede pro-Yes statements forcing the latter onto the defensive," Robertson added.
"This time in only one of six identifiable blocks of discourse did pro-Yes statements precede pro-No statements. This clearly presents the No argument as somehow "normal" and requires the Yes argument to justify itself," Prof. Robertson told RIA Novosti.
The long-standing issue of the Scottish independence is to be settled by a referendum scheduled for September 18, when voters will be invited to answer a yes/no question that reads: "Should Scotland become an independent country?"
If the majority of Scots vote for independence, then on March 24, 2016 Scotland will secede from the United Kingdom.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuart Cosgrove, despite working for the BBC, isn't afraid to call it as he sees it:

http://www.thedrum.com/news/2014/09/12/balance-failure-bbc-scottish-independence-referendum-coverage-wrong-and-not

He was very eloquent about his love for Scotalnd today on Off The Ball yesterday despite having Tam Cowan acting the clown while he was doing so.

Cosgrove is onto something there.

The BBC would give Cameron a couple of minutes, then go to Milliband/Brown for balance, on to Farage for colour and ratings before cutting to Salmond and think they're giving a rounded view of the arguments.

What they should be doing is - the Yes camp said this but then the No camp responded with this and vice versa. 50/50.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know Cosgrove, but I think he could care less about The Rangers scenario.

This referendum is of national importance and will affect every Scots-person the world over.

There are more important things in life than worrying about a diddy team who cheated then were found out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know Cosgrove, but I think he could care less about The Rangers scenario.

This referendum is of national importance and will affect every Scots-person the world over.

There are more important things in life than worrying about a diddy team who cheated then were found out.

Each to their own :wink2: :wink2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How Strange Cosgrove never called it when his employers where doing the same thing over Rangers.Vested interests I suppose.

There are more important things in life than football.

The referendum is about the future of our country.

If you can't see that the referendum is the most important thing to happen in our lifetimes, you need to wake up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


×
×
  • Create New...