Indyref 2 (2) - Page 193 - Anything Goes - Other topics not covered elsewhere - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Indyref 2 (2)


Recommended Posts

BBC Question time last night

Interuptions on Independence questions

Angela Constance SNP - 10

Stephen Noon - Yes Campaign - 3

Anas Sarwar LAB - 0

Megan Gallacher CON - 0

Kate Andrews - 0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

https://www.thenational.scot/news/23993918.supreme-court-indyref2-ruling-judicial-overreach---read-full/

AN extract from legal advice which argues the Supreme Court overreached into judicial activism by blocking Holyrood from holding indyref2 has been published by the Alba party.

The advice, written by constitutional law specialist Aidan O’Neill KC, argues that the Supreme Court's decision "to prohibit the (democratically elected and legitimate) Scottish Parliament from directly consulting the Scottish people which elected it ... is, to say the least, paradoxical".

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2023 at 2:23 PM, Ally Bongo said:

https://www.thenational.scot/news/23993918.supreme-court-indyref2-ruling-judicial-overreach---read-full/

AN extract from legal advice which argues the Supreme Court overreached into judicial activism by blocking Holyrood from holding indyref2 has been published by the Alba party.

The advice, written by constitutional law specialist Aidan O’Neill KC, argues that the Supreme Court's decision "to prohibit the (democratically elected and legitimate) Scottish Parliament from directly consulting the Scottish people which elected it ... is, to say the least, paradoxical".

 

 

I'm sure an SNP spokesperson (pronouns he/she/it) will be along soon to rubbish that view and stress that they have full confidence in the UK "supreme court".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2023 at 2:23 PM, Ally Bongo said:

https://www.thenational.scot/news/23993918.supreme-court-indyref2-ruling-judicial-overreach---read-full/

AN extract from legal advice which argues the Supreme Court overreached into judicial activism by blocking Holyrood from holding indyref2 has been published by the Alba party.

The advice, written by constitutional law specialist Aidan O’Neill KC, argues that the Supreme Court's decision "to prohibit the (democratically elected and legitimate) Scottish Parliament from directly consulting the Scottish people which elected it ... is, to say the least, paradoxical".

 

 

I am sure legal teams of the SNP looked at the decision too going through it with a fine tooth comb. To me it is just another clear example of where Westminster hold all the cards. Damned frustrating definitely but when you are in such shackles I do not see what the solution is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Caledonian Craig said:

Excuse me but what is so funny about that?

If ever there was any doubt you have just blown your cover.


i have never had any cover.  I have always said i am a right wing nationalist. The difference now is i have given up on the nationalism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Malcolm said:


i have never had any cover.  I have always said i am a right wing nationalist. The difference now is i have given up on the nationalism

I severely doubt it was ever there. Definitely is the case actually. There are posters on this thread who do not agree with SNP and policies but it is fair to say they have not given up on the idea of Scottish independence. You are making the usual unionist mistake in believing everyone who supports independence are only SNP voters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Malcolm said:


i have never had any cover.  I have always said i am a right wing nationalist. The difference now is i have given up on the nationalism

 

nationalists.webp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Caledonian Craig said:

I severely doubt it was ever there. Definitely is the case actually. There are posters on this thread who do not agree with SNP and policies but it is fair to say they have not given up on the idea of Scottish independence. You are making the usual unionist mistake in believing everyone who supports independence are only SNP voters. 


what right wing party can help me achieve independence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, vanderark14 said:

Me me me me me me me me

Malcolm in a nutshell. 


its actually bad for everyone.  People will retire early, cut their hours, increase pension contributions, etc. And that will damage public services and the economy.

stick it in your pension…. Retire at 55, making sure you have no debt.  Then take 56k of your pension each year (13k tax free) leaving income of 43k, top up another 7k in capital disposal or dividends each year, top up tax free with isa capital growth or income and you leave the labour market with a marginal 21% tax rate and have a comfortable lifestyle.

Thats what this budget is encouraging. 

there are numerous alternatives to cutting down to a 2/3 day week in combination with 

investing in property via a limited company and taking dividends and capital growth when its efficient to do so.

What this budget is penalising is working hard, aspiring to take on a bigger job and earn more. 

Spend it all now and live off the state from 80.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hampden_loon2878 said:

don't anyone be under no illusions, this is terrible for independence,, there is no papering over the cracks here, the snp are not working for independence anymore,, 


correct.  They are simply a far left party trying to push an hard left socialist manifesto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its over for the independence.  The missing piece of the jigsaw was the middle class centerist voters that were in the balance. Those that were in the yes ballot a week before the referendum and shat it after the vow and voted no.  Ironically i was a no until about two weeks before and then voted yes.
 

like it or not, they will all be hard no now as they can see the snp for the commies they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, hampden_loon2878 said:

we are see the steady erosion ofcorner stones of the independence debate by the snp,, how has it come to this,, its not realy about paying more tax,, its the message it sends out,, the party has been totally useless since salmond left

It should be no surprise that it has came to this if you listened to Alan Bissett prior to the No vote

 

 

Edited by Ally Bongo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Malcolm said:


the party had a chance but it chose humzah.  Thats like picking michael foote instead to tony blair.

Would not make any difference which party is in control at Holyrood as all they can do is rob peter to pay paul

But yes - what the party of Independence needs is an extremely populist leader instead of carrying on with the Sturgeonistas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, scotlad said:

 

Bit of a strange take from a Labour-supporting paper. I thought it was the SNP who were the "Tartan Tories". 🤔

Clearly they are ignoring the Labour Welsh budget

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-67748243

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dust will settle on this budget. It's down to the snp to make people aware that the budget is the result of having one hand tied behind their back on this fight. As AB says above, they have to rob peter to pay paul.

The only way out of this is independence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



×
×
  • Create New...