kumnio Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 14 hours ago, Scotty CTA said: My teams been relegated less times than you've lost your marbles, if you think thats going to wind me up, you're a bigger fruit loop than I think you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 4 hours ago, Scotty CTA said: Glad to see that you're finally questioning the moon landings. 😅😅 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thplinth Posted August 21, 2019 Share Posted August 21, 2019 Some colour from the twat in the hat. https://www.rt.com/op-ed/466983-ghislaine-robert-maxwell-epstein/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 22, 2019 Share Posted August 22, 2019 Getting weirder https://newrepublic.com/article/154826/jeffrey-epsteins-intellectual-enabler Jeffrey Epstein’s Intellectual Enabler How did Epstein meet so many luminaries in the worlds of science and technology? It all might trace back to literary agent John Brockman. If you are an accomplished science or technology writer, your books are probably handled by the most powerful literary agency in the field: the famous Brockman Inc., started by John Brockman and now run by Max Brockman, his son. As it happens, Max is also my agent—and has been since my first book was sold in 2009. As agencies go, I only have positive things to report: The Brockmans fight for their authors and get us very handsome advances. That’s what agents are for. Lately, John has been in the news for other reasons, namely because of his troubling connections to Jeffrey Epstein, the so-called financier who reportedly hanged himself earlier this month while facing federal charges of sex-trafficking. Epstein participated in the Edge Foundation’s annual questions, and attended its “billionaires’ dinners.” Brockman may also be the reason why so many prominent academics—from Steven Pinker to Daniel Dennett—have found themselves answering awkward questions about their associations with Epstein; they are clients of Brockman. Marvin Minsky, the prominent MIT scientist who surfaced as one of Epstein’s island buddies? A client of Brockman’s. Joi Ito, the director of the elite research facility MIT Media Lab, who has recently acknowledgedextensive ties to Epstein? Also, a client of Brockman’s. Knowing that Brockman likes to brag about all the famous people he has met and befriended—you can easily count the seconds until he name-checks “Marshall” (McLuhan) or “Andy” (Warhol) or “Gregory“ (Bateson) in a casual conversation—I decided to look over our correspondence over the past decade and see if he might have name-dropped Epstein somewhere. And, of course, he did. Browsing through our email correspondence, I stumbled upon a most peculiar email from September 12, 2013. It was very laconic: “JE, FYI, JB”—followed by my short bio and some media clippings. (You can check the entire PDF of the correspondence here.) Strangely, it was sent to me and had no other contacts in cc. Perhaps he wanted to send it to “JE” but put my email there by mistake. When I commented on the meaning of this cryptic message, he responded with the following message, reproduced here in full: I missed that one. Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire science philanthropist showed up at this weekend’s event by helicopter (with his beautiful young assistant from Belarus). He’ll be in Cambridge in a couple of weeks asked me who he should meet. You are one of the people I suggested and I told him I would send some links. He’s the guy who gave Harvard #30m to set up Martin Nowak. He’s been extremely generous in funding projects of many of our friends and clients. He also got into trouble and spent a year in jail in Florida. If he contacts you it’s probably worth your time to meet him as he’s extremely bright and interesting. Last time I visited his house (the largest private residence in NYC), I walked in to find him in a sweatsuit and a British guy in a suit with suspenders, getting foot massages from two young well-dressed Russian women. After grilling me for a while about cyber-security, the Brit, named Andy, was commenting on the Swedish authorities and the charges against Julian Assange. “We think they’re liberal in Sweden, but its more like Northern England as opposed to Southern Europe,” he said. “In Monaco, Albert works 12 hours a day but at 9pm, when he goes out, he does whatever he wants, and nobody cares. But, if I do it, I’m in big trouble.” At that point I realized that the recipient of Irina’s foot massage was his Royal Highness, Prince Andrew, the Duke of York. Indeed, a week later, on a slow news day, the cover of the NYpost had a full-page photo of Jeffrey and Andrew walking in Central Park under the headline: “The Prince and the Perv.” (That was the end of Andrew’s role at the UK trade ambassador. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 On 8/21/2019 at 3:00 AM, ParisInAKilt said: There’s obviously many layers to the 9/11 conspiracy but without better evidence I’m not convinced about faked planes. They've made sure that everyone saw their one 'magician's' trick at the South Tower and then simply told you 'stories' about the other 3 planes in line with that. No Muslim hijackers, and no planes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 On 8/21/2019 at 10:35 AM, kumnio said: My teams been relegated less times than you've lost your marbles, if you think thats going to wind me up, you're a bigger fruit loop than I think you are. It was a play on you telling me "down you go". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 Another bit of evidence against Prince Andrew. https://newrepublic.com/article/154826/jeffrey-epsteins-intellectual-enabler?fbclid=IwAR14DE2ck1CQ7NFDCcdSplbYRwAE0ftcInGDp37zlaBkGBla91nnSUHxQ2A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 9 minutes ago, phart said: Another bit of evidence against Prince Andrew. https://newrepublic.com/article/154826/jeffrey-epsteins-intellectual-enabler?fbclid=IwAR14DE2ck1CQ7NFDCcdSplbYRwAE0ftcInGDp37zlaBkGBla91nnSUHxQ2A You posted that last night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 I looked as well to see, can't even say anything just pure dumbfuckery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1163589661677125632.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jeffrey-epstein-madam-secret-palace-18995392 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 Another statement from Prince Andrew released... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49460263 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 1 hour ago, Toepoke said: Another statement from Prince Andrew released... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49460263 He was in jail for having sex with a child prostitute, although how a child can give consent to be a prostitute escapes me) so not sure what else there was to know. I see the bold Richard Dawkins was on the express as well, interesting considering the previous shit storm about his comments about peadophelia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huddersfield Posted August 25, 2019 Share Posted August 25, 2019 6 hours ago, phart said: He was in jail for having sex with a child prostitute, although how a child can give consent to be a prostitute escapes me) so not sure what else there was to know. I’m not normally someone who gets overly hung up on ‘PC’ language but on this issue I think you’re right & it’s important. What you are talking about is a prostituted child not a child prostitute. Changing the noun to a verb drastically changes context & communicates coercion rather than choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted August 27, 2019 Share Posted August 27, 2019 On 8/24/2019 at 7:30 PM, phart said: I see the bold Richard Dawkins was on the express as well, interesting considering the previous shit storm about his comments about peadophelia. What did he say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 27, 2019 Share Posted August 27, 2019 (edited) 18 hours ago, Scotty CTA said: What did he say? He's written about how believing in hell is more damaging to a child than getting abused or some such, if you google him Richard dawkins mild pedophilia it will come up, it's in one of his books i read. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/09/richard-dawkins-defends-mild-pedophilia-again-and-again/311230/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10998498/Richard-Dawkins-in-storm-over-mild-date-rape-tweets.html The telegraph is him going on about "mild" date rape. "CANTERBURY, England (RNS) Richard Dawkins, one of the world’s best-known and outspoken atheists, has provoked outrage among child protection agencies and experts after suggesting that recent child abuse scandals have been overblown. In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called “the mild pedophilia” he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s." "Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.” He said other children in his school peer group had been molested by the same teacher but concluded: “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.” https://www.huffpost.com/entry/richard-dawkins-pedophilia_n_3895514 It seems to be a theme with him. Edited August 27, 2019 by phart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alibi Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 Sounds like Dawkins is in some sort of denial about his schooldays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted August 29, 2019 Share Posted August 29, 2019 Obviously the cameras outside epsteins cell weren't functional. FBI studies two broken cameras outside cell where Epstein died: source https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-jeffrey-epstein-cameras-idUSKCN1VI2LC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 Well that's it over now Judge rules since he is dead the original plea deal immunising the co defendants stands and no more will be said. They arrested Epstein he killed himself nothing to see here now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 Seems story was ready to run 3 years ago but Buckingham palace used a "million" tricks to pull it, eventually it got pulled cause press would lose access to William and Kate. Access is a huge problem in media. In doping anyone that says anything no longer can do their job as get refused access, just had a report that media fear losing access to politicians etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 here's the "what she really meant" comment. Mind just last week ABC were posting videos of American gun ranges and saying it was Syrian fighting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanderark14 Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 Did anyone see the prince Andrew propaganda piece? Wow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 1 hour ago, vanderark14 said: Did anyone see the prince Andrew propaganda piece? Wow Couldn’t watch it but the link screamed propaganda. Incredible stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huddersfield Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 There's a good piece about it in the Guardian - interesting that in spite of the might of the Royal Family legal & publicity machine, I've not spoken to anyone or read anything suggesting anyone believes a word he says. More to the point, most media outlets are more or less quite openly calling him a liar. I think doing the interview was a bit of a 'Streisand Effect' cock-up really. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/16/prince-andrew-what-is-the-excuse-for-this-misogynistic-nonsense-served-up-in-a-gilded-chamber?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 7 hours ago, vanderark14 said: Did anyone see the prince Andrew propaganda piece? Wow Haven't watched it yet but it sounded like an absolute train wreck. Even the most royal arse licking papers this morning are giving him pelters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.