bonny78 Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Its a home game i think this is the way to play. 6 2 2 this way we still get 2 up front but all the defence we need. 2 link men in midfield too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 It hasn't always been the case but, nowadays 6 usually plays at the back alongside number 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haggis_trap Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 did craig levein not try that against Czech Republic once before ? though I agree we need to keep it tight. Delle Ali / Rashford / Sterling <etc> have potential to cause us real bother at the back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonny78 Posted May 22, 2017 Author Share Posted May 22, 2017 7 at the back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 If only we could play Jim Baxter at sweeper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mox Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 47 minutes ago, bonny78 said: Its a home game i think this is the way to play. 6 2 2 this way we still get 2 up front but all the defence we need. 2 link men in midfield too. You need to seek professional help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDange Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 No. If we try and defend against England they will slaughter us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 17 minutes ago, McDange said: No. If we try and defend against England they will slaughter us. We did a pretty good job of trying not to defend at Wembley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonny78 Posted May 22, 2017 Author Share Posted May 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Mox said: You need to seek professional help. For coaching u mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas Pete Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 7 hours ago, bonny78 said: Its a home game i think this is the way to play. 6 2 2 this way we still get 2 up front but all the defence we need. 2 link men in midfield too. What on earth have you been smoking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonny78 Posted May 22, 2017 Author Share Posted May 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Texas Pete said: What on earth have you been smoking? Defense is key Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas Pete Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 The defence is obviously important but so is the midfield. There's a reason why no sane manager has ever played a 6-2-2. Have a word with yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonny78 Posted May 22, 2017 Author Share Posted May 22, 2017 28 minutes ago, Texas Pete said: The defence is obviously important but so is the midfield. There's a reason why no sane manager has ever played a 6-2-2. Have a word with yourself. New idea. Shall we try 7 2 1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thplinth Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Why not just use all our players to build a human shield wall obscuring our goal mouth. 11 of the fattest people in Scotland could surely just bung up the goal meaning a clean sheet and a guaranteed 1 point EVERY game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ormond Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Cannae believe some folk on here still think Bonny is being serious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thplinth Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Whoah! I am playing along here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonny78 Posted May 22, 2017 Author Share Posted May 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, thplinth said: Why not just use all our players to build a human shield wall obscuring our goal mouth. 11 of the fattest people in Scotland could surely just bung up the goal meaning a clean sheet and a guaranteed 1 point EVERY game. I like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thplinth Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, bonny78 said: I like this. Good to see that you have a sense of humour at least (unlike Mr O). Edited May 22, 2017 by thplinth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonny78 Posted May 22, 2017 Author Share Posted May 22, 2017 Youll all wish we d done 6 at back when we get hammered 0-3 again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ormond Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 9 minutes ago, thplinth said: Good to see that you have a sense of humour at least (unlike Mr O). I actually wasn't on about you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 9 hours ago, Ormond said: Cannae believe some folk on here still think Bonny is being serious. I think Baxter would have been an excellent sweeper. Better than Beckenbauer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ormond Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 3 hours ago, Orraloon said: I think Baxter would have been an excellent sweeper. Better than Beckenbauer. Trigger would blow both out of the water. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas Pete Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 20 hours ago, Ormond said: Cannae believe some folk on here still think Bonny is being serious. I keep changing my mind between him being the worlds biggest wind up merchant and him not being aw there. Maybe it's a bit of both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonny78 Posted May 23, 2017 Author Share Posted May 23, 2017 I have knowledge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas Pete Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 20 hours ago, bonny78 said: New idea. Shall we try 7 2 1? Why not try 1-2-7? ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.