scoobydoo Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/35730322 How very Celtic. "In light of recent ill-considered comments made by journalists and players, it is perhaps timely to point out that we must all continue to Follow With Pride," said Rangers in a club website statement. "Clearly it rankles with some that we, Rangers, are still here with our history intact and the best way to protect this proud heritage is to ignore our detractors. "Do not react to them and give others cause to criticise our behaviour. "Instead, Follow With Pride and deny those who cannot accept reality, or legal judgment, to examine their own mind sets." Referencing their own Follow With Pride code of conduct, Rangers added on Friday: "Celebrate the club, its unbroken timeline, honours and achievements but do not sing any inappropriate songs. "Gestures and chants which are deemed offensive should also be avoided no matter the level of provocation and, while it is important to be aware Police Scotland, the SFA and SPFL can take action, remember also that this club enforces its own code of conduct. "Fans who behave in an inappropriate manner and who bring the club into disrepute will face punishment. "They might be given lifetime or limited bans, so please, let us all support Rangers in the correct way." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 That's you on the list Scooby! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 Bathered Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 He's an Arab. Surely he's already on the list? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 All that's missing is a big NO SURRENDER and that would be complete! I get what they're trying to say but it's pretty cringey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iainmac1 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 As the song goes: No one likes us, and we care a lot and will spend hours crying about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 My diplomatic skills are tuned to the max when dealing with any aspect of the rangers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haggis McBasher Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 No. They're the new Rangers Where have you been since 2012? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock strap Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 13 minutes ago, Haggis McBasher said: No. They're the new Rangers Where have you been since 2012? Im going for Larky to respond in the very near future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 54 minutes ago, Haggis McBasher said: No. They're the new Rangers Where have you been since 2012? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalgety Bay TA Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 The "unbroken timeline" and "history intact" comments seem just to be trying that bit too hard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Dalgety Bay TA said: The "unbroken timeline" and "history intact" comments seem just to be trying that bit too hard. That's what caught my eye. and this Gestures and chants which are deemed offensive should also be avoided no matter the level of provocation Because the rangers fans always need to be provoked to sing offensive songs. A bit patheltic. Edited March 5, 2016 by scoobydoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitre Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Hope you haters are watching todays game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 28 minutes ago, scoobydoo said: That's what caught my eye. and this Gestures and chants which are deemed offensive should also be avoided no matter the level of provocation Because the rangers fans always need to be provoked to sing offensive songs. A bit patheltic. How should they have worded that bit then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 3 minutes ago, RenfrewBlue said: How should they have worded that bit then? "Please don't sing the sash, billy boys, no pope of rome, the famine song ad infinitum". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 12 minutes ago, scoobydoo said: "Please don't sing the sash, billy boys, no pope of rome, the famine song ad infinitum". Even if a Dundee player wound you up a bit? The statement almost sounds like getting the excuses in early for any abuse Harkins might've got today. (Or saying, I know you want to call him all the Fenian this that and the others under the sun, and we agree, but it's frowned upon ) To be fair, Rangers appear to have done their talking on the park given the scoreline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 5 hours ago, scoobydoo said: http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/35730322 How very Celtic. "Gestures and chants which are deemed offensive should also be avoided no matter the level of provocation I wonder what level of provocation they're talking about, being a catholic in 21st Century Scotland?Having Irish ancestors? Not recognizing the supremacy of Protestantism? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 1 hour ago, phart said: I wonder what level of provocation they're talking about, being a catholic in 21st Century Scotland?Having Irish ancestors? Not recognizing the supremacy of Protestantism? those are just three. Not recognising they are "ra peepul" is usually enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock strap Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Rangers obviously better than Celtic after this weeks results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 3 hours ago, Mitre said: Hope you haters are watching todays game Because some of us find that statement laughable we are haters? Great result for the rangers today - played very well by all accounts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haggis McBasher Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, phart said: I wonder what level of provocation they're talking about, being a catholic in 21st Century Scotland?Having Irish ancestors? Not recognizing the supremacy of Protestantism? All of the above plus anyone who reminds them that their original club was liquidated and they're now following a tribute act. Trigger's broom loyal Edited March 5, 2016 by Haggis McBasher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 5 hours ago, scoobydoo said: "Please don't sing the sash, billy boys, no pope of rome, the famine song ad infinitum". That's so much better and wouldnt have set you lot off at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 3 hours ago, phart said: I wonder what level of provocation they're talking about, being a catholic in 21st Century Scotland?Having Irish ancestors? Not recognizing the supremacy of Protestantism? I think it was scoring against us. Fortunately it didn't matter today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larky Masher Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 On 5 March 2016 at 0:04 PM, jock strap said: Im going for Larky to respond in the very near future. Why would I respond to that serial troll f*ckwit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock strap Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 52 minutes ago, Larky Masher said: Why would I respond to that serial troll f*ckwit? I'd prefer it if you would just get straight to the point and state your honest opinion please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.