Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 Was gonna be one thing,but waited for the topic but it never arrived,then the second came along and the topic never arrived,so then it became a third.So in reverse order. 1. Does no one post anything interesting anymore.. 2. Obamas comments on brexit, hilarious. 3. Charlies inability to recognise who his mother is the @ruler,head of state blah blah' of. Does no one check this shit? During the broadcast the heir to the throne said: "She shall be, to the happiness of England,' An aged princess; many days shall see her, And yet no day without a deed to crown it." 4.We could have avoided all this if we had some balls last year. Shit, that's four, I'll go out and start this again, amongst the weapons ....., Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 16 minutes ago, Eisegerwind said: 1. Does no one post anything interesting anymore.. Not from the evidence in this thread so far. Have you been on the havering juice tonight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Author Share Posted April 22, 2016 I have, but surely Obama's pronouncements on brexit are both worthy of comment and hilarious, Charlies speech is ignorant and as I said does no one check this shit,I thought the usual subjects would be all over this, and thirdly 'we could have avoided all this if we had some balls last year, it's hardly havering.Just thought they were topics worthy of discussion and surprised no one had posted about them previously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 What happened last year that meant we could have avoided it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 I don't think Obama will have much influence on the outcome. I don't have much interest in all the pish surrounding the inbred parasites we call the royal family. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Author Share Posted April 22, 2016 16 minutes ago, Cove_Sheep said: What happened last year that meant we could have avoided it? 'kin hell, time marches on, really, 2 years ago! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 17 minutes ago, Orraloon said: I don't think Obama will have much influence on the outcome. I don't have much interest in all the pish surrounding the inbred parasites we call the royal family. His TTIP stuff might help the out mob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Author Share Posted April 22, 2016 16 minutes ago, Orraloon said: I don't think Obama will have much influence on the outcome. I don't have much interest in all the pish surrounding the inbred parasites we call the royal family. 1.What he said today was 'you're ####ed if you you leave the EU' I think that might influence a few voters! 2. Neither do I, but it's worth comment surely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErsatzThistle Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 Quote 3. Charlies inability to recognise who his mother is the @ruler,head of state blah blah' of. Does no one check this shit? During the broadcast the heir to the throne said: "She shall be, to the happiness of England,' An aged princess; many days shall see her, And yet no day without a deed to crown it." I'm not offended by this. As far as I'm concerned they are England's royal family. Surely your not a monarchist in this day and age ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Author Share Posted April 22, 2016 I'm not that bothered when Obama says were at the bottom of the queue for trade agreements, but does that mean we'll also be at the bottom of the queue for helping them bombing people back to the stoneage, we need to know this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Author Share Posted April 22, 2016 25 minutes ago, Cove_Sheep said: His TTIP stuff might help the out mob. No idea what this means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Author Share Posted April 22, 2016 Quick google TTIP , consp..,capitalists doing what a captalsits do, nothing to see here, move along. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stapes Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 34 minutes ago, Eisegerwind said: 1.What he said today was 'you're ####ed if you you leave the EU' I think that might influence a few voters! The threats are having an influence on me. Driving me from a pretty solid Remain towards the Leave camp. But then I won't lose sleep either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Author Share Posted April 22, 2016 34 minutes ago, ErsatzThistle said: I'm not offended by this. As far as I'm concerned they are England's royal family. Surely your not a monarchist in this day and age ? No, I'm a republican and I'm not offended.I'm just really surprised that Charlie writes a blurb about his mum and none of his advisors say better make that UK or Great Britain or Britain, or whatever and to be honest I'm not sure what is correct but I'm pretty sure England is wrong,or maybe it's not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 22, 2016 Author Share Posted April 22, 2016 I hate to labour the point but would a Scottish monarchist find ' "She shall be, to the happiness of England,' , acceptable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErsatzThistle Posted April 23, 2016 Share Posted April 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Eisegerwind said: I hate to labour the point but would a Scottish monarchist find ' "She shall be, to the happiness of England,' , acceptable. I don't think Jackson Carlaw, Murdo Fraser or Alex Johnstone would mind in the slightest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 23, 2016 Author Share Posted April 23, 2016 14 minutes ago, ErsatzThistle said: I don't think Jackson Carlaw, Murdo Fraser or Alex Johnstone would mind in the slightest. Showing my ignorance but I don't know who any of these people are. Google here I come. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 23, 2016 Author Share Posted April 23, 2016 Not as interesting as I'd hoped, just some random Conservative types.Guess they might be OK with it but they'd be still be technically wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pool Q Posted April 23, 2016 Share Posted April 23, 2016 (edited) If the 'Charlie' comment refers to what I think it does, he is reading an extract from Shakespeare's Henry VIII, the speech by Cranmer. It is, I guess, meant to mark both the Queen's birthday and the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare's death. I'm a republican, and would get rid of the monarchy tomorrow given the chance (which the SNP wouldn't incidentally), but I honestly can't be bothered getting offended by that reading by Charles on his mother's birthday. Obama's intervention is clumsy at best, and is another example of the Remain campaign following the same strategy as the BT one in 2014. They need to be careful, they are doing much of the Leave campaign's work for them. Edited April 23, 2016 by Pool Q Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil r Posted April 23, 2016 Share Posted April 23, 2016 12 hours ago, Cove_Sheep said: His TTIP stuff might help the out mob. He's at T in the Park? He's a dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted April 23, 2016 Author Share Posted April 23, 2016 5 hours ago, Pool Q said: If the 'Charlie' comment refers to what I think it does, he is reading an extract from Shakespeare's Henry VIII, the speech by Cranmer. It is, I guess, meant to mark both the Queen's birthday and the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare's death. I'm a republican, and would get rid of the monarchy tomorrow given the chance (which the SNP wouldn't incidentally), but I honestly can't be bothered getting offended by that reading by Charles on his mother's birthday. Obama's intervention is clumsy at best, and is another example of the Remain campaign following the same strategy as the BT one in 2014. They need to be careful, they are doing much of the Leave campaign's work for them. Whoops, totally correct,I hope the Royals will accept my humblest apologies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted April 23, 2016 Share Posted April 23, 2016 32 minutes ago, Eisegerwind said: Whoops, totally correct,I hope the Royals will accept my humblest apologies. They'll be fine with it I'm sure, after all a fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alibi Posted April 23, 2016 Share Posted April 23, 2016 The remain campaign is getting right up my nose. I will be voting to remain, but the more they go on with Project Fear 2.0, the more I would like to vote to leave just to GIRFU them. On the other hand, the leave lot are just as bad. Vote to remain and then vote for Indy in the near-inevitable second referendum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alibi Posted April 23, 2016 Share Posted April 23, 2016 2 hours ago, Eisegerwind said: Whoops, totally correct,I hope the Royals will accept my humblest apologies. Unionist toadie... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErsatzThistle Posted April 23, 2016 Share Posted April 23, 2016 10 minutes ago, Alibi said: The remain campaign is getting right up my nose. I will be voting to remain, but the more they go on with Project Fear 2.0, the more I would like to vote to leave just to GIRFU them. On the other hand, the leave lot are just as bad. Vote to remain and then vote for Indy in the near-inevitable second referendum. Your right. I'm voting to remain too but it's a bad idea for the remain campaign to have Paddy Pantsdown speaking for them. That patronising tone and haughty cut glass accent sends my blood pressure sky high Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.