TDYER63 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 4 minutes ago, Ally Bongo said: Do you not remember the plaudits "There will be blood" received ? No, never heard of it. A quick google search says it was made in 2007 and appears to be similar to Oppenheimer in its cinematic outstandingness !! In 2007 I would have been ogling Johnny Depp in Pirates of the Caribbean 🤓 🏴☠️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Bongo Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 12 minutes ago, TDYER63 said: No, never heard of it. A quick google search says it was made in 2007 and appears to be similar to Oppenheimer in its cinematic outstandingness !! In 2007 I would have been ogling Johnny Depp in Pirates of the Caribbean 🤓 🏴☠️ I dont recall any other film enraging me as much as that 2h 40minutes fucking crap as i sat hoping it was going to get better I can guarantee Oppenheimer will be better than it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDYER63 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 7 minutes ago, Ally Bongo said: I dont recall any other film enraging me as much as that 2h 40minutes fucking crap as i sat hoping it was going to get better I can guarantee Oppenheimer will be better than it Hmm, I wouldn’t bet my house on it unless advancement in technology over 17 years has given it the edge. As I said in my original unredacted critique, the only thing that got me through it was a comfy reclining seat, Cillian Murphy and a family size bag of skittles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanderark14 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 I enjoyed oppenheimer, don't get the hatred for it. I like long films too but they are becoming few and far between. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDYER63 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 19 minutes ago, vanderark14 said: I enjoyed oppenheimer, don't get the hatred for it. I like long films too but they are becoming few and far between. I thought the acting was good and dont mind long films if there is justification for it but I felt nothing would have been lost had this film been an hour less. My main point is really that I am surprised that it rates highly simply because a 3 hr sort of docudrama is not really the general publics thing , and I think a lot of people would have been sucked into going by the trailers which suggested far more action that there actually was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.