Parklife Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Just now, slasher said: Yes you did, before you got Christie. You couldn't afford him. Yet Hibs could? I'm pretty sure you're havering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Parklife said: Yet Hibs could? I'm pretty sure you're havering. Well Aberdeen weren't willing to match the terms Hibs offered, so spin that as you like ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecie Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, slasher said: Well Aberdeen weren't willing to match the terms Hibs offered, so spin that as you like ? Further proof that the Famous are a very well run club. Nice one Dons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, slasher said: Well Aberdeen weren't willing to match the terms Hibs offered, so spin that as you like ? No need to spin anything. You said Aberdeen "couldn't afford him", which is clearly incorrect. Good day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Parklife said: No need to spin anything. You said Aberdeen "couldn't afford him", which is clearly incorrect. Good day. Couldn't afford as much as Hibs. Good day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 minute ago, slasher said: Couldn't afford as much as Hibs. Good day. Didn't want to spend money he wasn't worth perhaps? He's hardly tearing up the Championship. Better chippies in Aberdeen right enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, slasher said: Couldn't afford as much as Hibs. Good day. If i pint of milk is £20 i could afford to buy it. I'd think it was a rip-off and would choose not to though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil r Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Especially if it had been stuck in the second tier of the fridge for 3 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 11 minutes ago, Squirrelhumper said: Didn't want to spend money he wasn't worth perhaps? He's hardly tearing up the Championship. Better chippies in Aberdeen right enough. He's not in the championship, keep up ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamntg Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 16 minutes ago, neil r said: Especially if it had been stuck in the second tier of the fridge for 3 years. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 23 minutes ago, slasher said: He's not in the championship, keep up ? Not even good enough for that it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 6 minutes ago, Squirrelhumper said: Not even good enough for that it seems. I'm pretty sure that wasn't the reason, anyway I couldn't care less. The fact is , the sheep wanted him in January which given the bile directed at him from some of them on here I found pretty funny ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 9 minutes ago, slasher said: The fact is , the sheep wanted him in January Nope. That's far from an established "fact", you just repeating it doesn't add validity to the statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 22 minutes ago, slasher said: I'm pretty sure that wasn't the reason, anyway I couldn't care less. The fact is , the sheep wanted him in January which given the bile directed at him from some of them on here I found pretty funny ? From what i can gather they inquired about him, found out Celtic were wanting silly money in terms of wages for somebody who has barely kicked a ball in the past 18 months and decided he wasn't worth it. Personally, i think Aberdeen didn't need him. They have better options than a half fit Commons. Had the lost their best player to Cardiff then they might have decided he was worth a gamble but in the end they never needed to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Squirrelhumper said: From what i can gather they inquired about him, found out Celtic were wanting silly money in terms of wages for somebody who has barely kicked a ball in the past 18 months and decided he wasn't worth it. Personally, i think Aberdeen didn't need him. They have better options than a half fit Commons. Had the lost their best player to Cardiff then they might have decided he was worth a gamble but in the end they never needed to. Celtic weren't wanting silly money for him. Dunno where u get that from. Parkies assertion is that they could easily have afforded him but didn't think him value for money, I'm not so sure. What's the top earner at the sheep getting these days? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecie Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, slasher said: Celtic weren't wanting silly money for him. Dunno where u get that from. Parkies assertion is that they could easily have afforded him but didn't think him value for money, I'm not so sure. What's the top earner at the sheep getting these days? lol. We've won all but 1 game since the transfer window opened and he wouldn't have been able to play in that game. Why would we splash out on him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 5 minutes ago, slasher said: Celtic weren't wanting silly money for him. Dunno where u get that from. Parkies assertion is that they could easily have afforded him but didn't think him value for money, I'm not so sure. What's the top earner at the sheep getting these days? More than the top earner at Hibs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 I notice neither of you have answered the question. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecie Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 12 minutes ago, slasher said: I notice neither of you have answered the question. ? Personally I couldn't give a phück who earns what, just as long as we can afford it and keep winning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 15 minutes ago, deecie said: Personally I couldn't give a phück who earns what, just as long as we can afford it and keep winning And there you have it. If you have no idea what the wage structure is then you have no idea on affordability. Parkie now denying it even happened lol ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 minute ago, slasher said: Parkie now denying it even happened lol ? Nope, you've stated that something is a "fact" and are unable to provide any corroboration of this "fact". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Parklife said: Nope, you've stated that something is a "fact" and are unable to provide any corroboration of this "fact". It is fact and you still haven't answered my question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 (edited) Bizarre argument. Aberdeen were interested in taking Commons on loan, they couldn't agree a deal, he's sitting on his thumbs for £20k a week at Celtic. What is it you're arguing about? Edited February 28, 2017 by sbcmfc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 57 minutes ago, slasher said: Celtic weren't wanting silly money for him. Dunno where u get that from. Parkies assertion is that they could easily have afforded him but didn't think him value for money, I'm not so sure. What's the top earner at the sheep getting these days? I mean in terms of wages, i'm guessing if he was going to Aberdeen then Celtic would have to have paid some of his wages, with Aberdeen making up the shortfall? It seems Commons is happier just sitting on his arse collecting his wages though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecie Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 22 minutes ago, slasher said: And there you have it. If you have no idea what the wage structure is then you have no idea on affordability. Parkie now denying it even happened lol ? Terrible conclusion. You need to try harder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.