Flora MaDonald Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 He's a Hibee as well. And I thought me and my old man were the only Hibees in Bath. J I thought he was a Dons man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 I thought he was a Dons man. The only Yes voting Dons are on here... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishcumnock Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 Not biting . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Wings over Scotland and the aggressive Rev Stup previously based his logic on a very small sample of GERS figures as that fitted in with what he wanted to try and state in his unique aggressive style. The recent blog is written in a similar aggressive style which is interesting to understand the person writing or the thinking behind it. The recent blog is now saying that GERS should be questioned. It actually raises issues of tax raises and expenditure cuts. The Nationalist “Wheel of Fortune” continues. “Celtic Tiger”, “Arc of Prosperity”, “Oil revenues increase”, “GERS”. All part of an incorrect list from Nationalists. So should GERS be used or not used now? Was the White Paper a massive paper weight? Anyone who disagrees are now generally dismissed as part of the MSM as nationalists sound more and more like American Tea Party evangelists. Still no data and evidence on the real costings and money in v money out is shown by nationalists. It’s all hidden by “land of chocolate” v “talking Scotland down”. The evidence and proof of the protection of the financial wellbeing of my family has still not been proven. I cannot understand anyone who picks a flag or a party over their family. Rev Stu is a professional blogger. He probably peaked, as most do in professions, in the computer games industry and his nature probably causes him to not be very good in interviews. He’s pulled a good one here. Crowd funded to fund a lifestyle that allows him to live and to rant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjd1972 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 I'd rather fund the lifestyle of Stuart Campbell than that of serial liars like Alan Cochrane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 I cannot understand anyone who picks a flag or a party over their family. Brilliant. Except how many people on both sides did this? People voted yes for their family, just like many who voted no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haggis_trap Posted November 14, 2015 Author Share Posted November 14, 2015 Wings over Scotland and the aggressive Rev Stup previously based his logic on a very small sample of GERS figures as that fitted in with what he wanted to try and state in his unique aggressive style. The recent blog is written in a similar aggressive style which is interesting to understand the person writing or the thinking behind it. The recent blog is now saying that GERS should be questioned. It actually raises issues of tax raises and expenditure cuts. The Nationalist “Wheel of Fortune” continues. “Celtic Tiger”, “Arc of Prosperity”, “Oil revenues increase”, “GERS”. All part of an incorrect list from Nationalists. So should GERS be used or not used now? Was the White Paper a massive paper weight? Anyone who disagrees are now generally dismissed as part of the MSM as nationalists sound more and more like American Tea Party evangelists. Still no data and evidence on the real costings and money in v money out is shown by nationalists. It’s all hidden by “land of chocolate” v “talking Scotland down”. The evidence and proof of the protection of the financial wellbeing of my family has still not been proven. I cannot understand anyone who picks a flag or a party over their family. Rev Stu is a professional blogger. He probably peaked, as most do in professions, in the computer games industry and his nature probably causes him to not be very good in interviews. He’s pulled a good one here. Crowd funded to fund a lifestyle that allows him to live and to rant. Here is the thing Alan. For all the flaws (that you list) he is perfect counter balance to the pish we get from "journalists" in the unionist media. Not only that : he has more readers than the Daily Record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.