Bzzzz

I agree, I wouldn't even allow tabasco to take the edge aff it.

It is eh? it's like a big sleeping giant.

I hope you saw this... the site of the First Hampden Park, the first purpose built fitba stadium in the world!

It wasn't! you're maybe getting mixed up with the first international match being in 1872. Cathkin, (2nd Hampden) was opened by Queens Park in 1884, the First Hampden Park, across the road from Cathkin was opened in 1873... 150 years ago... LOTS of info here if you're interested... The Hampden Collection – Celebrating, Promoting & Protecting the 3 Hampden Parks and All Who Played On Them

I'd rather eat a mug of hot dug shite than go and watch Man U at Murrayfield.

Who isn't? you or me?

Would the ICJ not take a position on this? UN Resolution 1514XV & Millenium Declaration Res 55/2 would apply surely?

The fact is they'll keep moving the goalposts to suit their agenda as they did with the 40% threshold in 1979 and as they have ever since. We need to stop pishing about with an aggressive master/colonial state and take this to international courts. To tell us there is no legal route to independence is in itself against the law, at the very least we can force their hand on that IF we present it properly.

Ah, I wasn't replying to the thread apologies, just the eligibility thing, I stay well away from this GRR debate as IMO there are far too many self righteous fowk intent on overcomplicating things to make a statement. I completely agree with what you're saying, I think it's been allowed to become ridiculous to the point where it's counter productive to even equality and sensibility.

I've always thought the best way answer to that question is to ask them. I think in particular by the time you get to signing contracts age then you know what you are, and if there is ambiguity, that's where eligibility rules step in.

I'd have Doak in the squad now.

As long as England get pumped who cares!

Yes but we took 2 Caldwells, any team with 2 Caldwells is destined to get pumped. Can't see that happening this time, stick Porteous on Haaland and he'll be invisible.

We should. Get him telt, PLEASE go away, you've caused enough damage already.

Eh? he's always looked like this!

Spot on.

😂 get her telt... up the road we go..

People no allowed to have opinions now? you've been living in London too long fella.

Agree about the beards, tattoos and hats. Just looks lazy. Can you imagine some guy with UJ's up his arms in a baseball cap trying to arrest you? it wouldn't go peacefully that's for sure..

I agree, "hate" seems to be the default for fowk these days. I've been looking at the Joanna Cherry thing over the last few days, she's certainly NOT trans phobic, the problem with this particular argument over The Stand is that the one's supporting the venue's stance are not prepared to listen to Ms Cherry's stance on this because they see her as Gender Critical, which in my opinion pishes all over THEIR argument. I think what she's saying about self ID is sensible and is about protecting people rather than discriminating against others. But then I'm a guy, with a cock, so it's probably none of my business.

I'm away at present escaping the uj wankery but can do when I get back.

Claim of Right, part of our constitution, Scots are sovereign, not the King. The King serves us and pledges allegiance TO us. The English pledge allegiance to their King. And if we dinnae like whit he's up tae, we can bin him and get oorselves a new yin. Saying that, having an unelected head of state who thinks he's there because a god chose him to be, is just silly talk. If we HAVE to have a monarchy then it should be for ornamental purposes ONLY.

Aye, I've got a few, the original is far better quality, the badge is a wee bit bigger but the embroidering far superior. Saying that, the dhgate ones are actually braw, fit really nicely, nice material etc, seeing as the original cost £63 I'll be wearing the fake ones to away games! Was in JD in Argyle St yesterday, if yer after original jerseys they've got some, at least one L and loads of smaller ones.

That would involve thinking for one's self.

"Yet if he should give up what he has begun, and agree to make us or our kingdom subject to the King of England or the English, we should exert ourselves at once to drive him out as our enemy and a subverter of his own rights and ours, and make some other man who was well able to defend us our King; for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule." We should have turned our back on the monarchy when James VI fucked off to England.