Redz - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Redz

Member
  • Posts

    1,992
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Recent Profile Visitors

4,167 profile views

Redz's Achievements

  1. A fine example of experiencing the lows to appreciate the highs I 'enjoyed' thatπŸ‘
  2. Purely anecdotal, but did anyone else notice the amount of empty seats in the Leverkusen home sections last night ? If they make the final I hope they're not expecting a fair share of the tickets - That would just be so undeserving and unfair on the other team involved UEFA need to take note
  3. End to end stuff in Leverkusen - Decent game! Edit: 3-2 BL FT
  4. - Not once did I ask you to explain anything - You do though, your tone confirms this - There's no diddy club grievance mentality I do however have an interest in fair play, and there's nothing in your opinions that, IMO, are grounds for not having a 50 / 50 split I can see we're not going to agree on that specific point however - I'm fine with that
  5. In which case they are 'punished' by removing their ability to sell sections until previous sections are sold then - Not by handing the other team an unfair sporting advantage There's actually an undertone in your text that suggests you think it correct they should receive less tickets than Celtic, regardless of denying it previously (Your parting comment backs this up) In short it's wrong - Size of support or what's went before has nothing to do with having the same amount of fans in Hampden as Celtic (Or Rangers) on cup final day
  6. There's no reason(s) that prevent the possibility of a 50 / 50 split Like a few have said, start by giving both clubs the opportunity to sell 50% by a certain date. If they don't, they go to the other side. That's right and proper The size of support / average crowd is an irrelevance in this situation
  7. I think that's all the non Celtic fans on here are saying πŸ‘
  8. Celtic and their support can dress this up as they like, but it's just wrong. On a par with 'wanting' a strong league and real challenge, when they absolutely do not.
  9. I suspect there are legal obligations to playing the match. Having 'their own end' could (mostly) be batted off as 'police advice' I suppose. Not sure how the dressing room thing works, however as much as it would be annoying if so, it's not as unfair an advantage as not having a 50 / 50 split. Hibs could canvass their fans before agreeing to take any tickets - If that was to turn into 'tell them to ram their 17,500 allocation,' I think that would be enough heat to make them think again. If they did not they are openly favouring one of 2 teams in a final and sporting integrity goes out the window. It's that simple....
  10. Noticed the 'allocation' last night Time for a club not to take up their allocation if its not 50/50, or at least has the chance to be I'd support that should Aberdeen ever reach a final again
  11. 3 1 HT Watching on hesgoal - WTF is that WATP commentary like πŸ™„πŸ˜‚
  12. Tend to agree, although I was simply highlighting that both are identical under the 'rules' Sadly one was, and one wasn't though
  13. Regardless of where it took place, or the provocation, Tavernier lifts his hands to the guy - Yellow card based on yesterday's example As others have said, Ojo's was a second yellow too
  14. You've never been to Norwich have you ?
×
×
  • Create New...