No, I think you're conflating my post with someone else's (I didn't mention Craig Gordon in mine).
My point is that if we're looking for a long-term replacement to Gordon, then a 30 year old isn't ideal. Not totally pointless as you might get 6-8 years out of him if you're lucky, but ideal world you'd want someone like a young Gordon ready to be drafted in, aged 21/22. Ideal world as I say, but a 30 year old is edging towards the other end of the spectrum, titled 'that'll do for now'.