thplinth's Content - Page 291 - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

thplinth

Member
  • Posts

    11,009
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by thplinth

  1. It is amazing how the green / blue blinkers work. Even when potentially important information is visible it is ignored as tim-tainted. Phil the Gob, as much as you hate him, pretty much broke the story of RFC 1899 being in danger of going under back in the day. Whoever his sources really are (now or then) they are not infallible, but they are clearly not to be taken lightly neither. (just a tiny tiny ps but why has Mr X'hundred posts per month Eddard gone so quiet in the immediate aftermath of the King coming to power. ...was he a shill?
  2. Whoah me too! Possibly between the two of us then we have brought them to their knees. 'Think twice next time Tesco ya bass!' (Before you cut my bulk buying orders of your discount wines (you kunts)). Now things have moved on. I have found a new avenue to be a cheap that does not involve you at all. Suck on that.
  3. Right on cue... up pops this khunt. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02p9j8p Been wowndering about this guy for a while. Very suspicious character.
  4. http://jewssansfrontieres.blogspot.ca/2015/04/how-stuff-works-greville-janner-his-son.html What a rotten country, a Nonce-ocracy it appears.
  5. This is the bit that stood out for me... Talk about sending the message....we are untouchables.
  6. edit better link: https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/09/26/its-time-to-hunt-down-paedophile-criminal-greville-janner/
  7. Are some elements trying to get this thread closed? (Maybe much like the king is trying to shut down the transparency he claimed to bring?)
  8. tut tut, do you not know about the 'swing'? one vote less for brown sure... but if the same vote is then one more for the snp. so it just takes half the 23,000 to defect and it is a dead heat (assuming the snp were 2nd). considering that Gordon Brown is the essence of quisling, a modern day parcel of rogues wrapped up into one parcel of utter egotistical ness I do think it is possible that 11,500 people realize they are voting for the absolute worst of sell-out Scotland in voting for that hideous old sack of vanity. But probably not, they have sucked his disease mottled evil old kock this long why break the habits of lifetime.
  9. The Kiev neo-nazi's just murdered this guy.... part of a series of recent assassinations that seem to be hugely under-reported in the west for some reason. Too busy worry about that shot Russian MP I expect. You have to activate the sub-titles but it is fascinating having sampled the first 20 mins. Hard to follow at times given the knowledge he has... http://russia-insider.com/en/listen-very-interesting-short-history-ukraine-assasinated-oles-buzina/5751
  10. Anyone else (very) uncomfortable with the road Nicola is taking here?
  11. Why not now take out a secured 10m loan against the prize asset, ibrox and simply pay Ashley off, after all Ibrox is the only asset that has not been so far pawned out... or has it, or do you even own it. Did you see the comments by King a few days ago about how RFC should be governed going forward? Not good.
  12. hmmmm meanwhile some very interesting points raised in this recent post... http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/forces-perfectly-positioned/
  13. It is a 100bn bribe to buy the votes of 1.3m living in council houses who probably would never have voted tory. 100bn in assets that you as a taxpayer paid for and own. Used to buy votes for Eton Dave. Think of it as yet another union dividend. As for the folk living the in council houses, for 100k what do you think they will do? It'll be the same as it was under Thatcher, wave a few quid at folk and they are tripping over themselves to get a piece of the action. They sold off most of the country at huge discounts to greedy punters eager for more without thinking of the long term consequences and this is just more of the same.
  14. It is not just the weather map Then someone noticed it was not in the correct scale... http://wingsoverscotland.com/a-matter-of-scale/#more-69557
  15. He looks like some wee media / PR arsehole rather than your average SAS type.
  16. This is also excellent (originally released in 2004 I think) and has incredibly detailed timelines for each hijacked plance in its appendices. http://www.justicefor911.org/911CW_omission_report.pdf
  17. I defy anyone on here to read those 87 eye witness accounts of the plane hitting the pentagon and then come on here and tell us it was a missile or a drone. I think the reason they do not release the footage is maybe the flying might be too good. Not becasue it was not a giant plane seen by 87 different witnesses.
  18. Mr Wells sums up my feelings on the Controlled Demolition debate very well. http://rigint.blogspot.cz/2007/03/its-real-thing.html
  19. Yeah I have seen that before. Also reports of heavy and loud noises coming from 'empty' floors and lots of maintenace work that could have been a cover. Plus the fact that most of the towers were empty. It makes it easy to do over a period of months probably. If that is what happened. ps. 87 eye witness accounts of the pane coming into the pentagon. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/F77penta03.html#p3
  20. If it was controlled demolition using conventional demolition technologies then I would have thought somewhere they did a mock up of the WTC construction (a few floors at least) and tested how it would work. That building was unique in many ways and to bring it down in one go perfectly first time in the way it did, it would have to have been tested in advance. To leap to energy weapons is just too far and unnecessary. I think 7 was rigged for sure but there may be a reason it was pre-rigged (for security reasons). I am not 100% on 1&2, probably bet yes but for the reasons stated it would have been a hell of risky endeavour for the plotters. The comments made to Randy Glass make you think yes as well, "coming down". From what I have seen these energy weapons seem to revolve around laser and microwave weapons. I am not sure how this could bring down gigantic buildings anyway.
  21. Well do what I did Harry, think back on the video and sum up the main pieces of evidence that she presents. Just bullets, what evidence did she present? I think you'll find it is not evidence of anything really. Take the 'dustification' of the steel pillars left standing briefly... if you covered steel pillars in heavy dust and then they collapsed straight down the dust on them would not fall as fast and would leave a 'dust footprint' hanging in the air. This does not mean the pillars turned to dust. It is all easily explained without the need to introduce energy weapons. And without any real evidence to do so is just a bad turn IMHO.
  22. Just reading the wikipage... FFS it is hard to believe this shyte is being applied to football badges. Still not signing but.
×
×
  • Create New...