dipped flake

agree 100% (God when is the last time I said that to a rangers fan ). Hope he can go on and show the talent he obviously has

good news for Scottish football, I presume Doncaster/Regan are once more trumpeting this to all and sundry to prove how well the game is doing...................well maybe not

just in case anyone was not aware there was a game on last night, the rangers are now 12 point behind in the championship race, and could very easily be 15 points by Saturday evening - happy days

it would actually be 3 clubs that would have to veto change with a 10-2 voting structure. The whole idea of changing it is to stop celtic and the rangers being able to veto something they don't like. Every fan I know wants the vote changed but the big clubs, not just celtic/rangers are worried they could be made to share gates and lose out

so will celtic do the decent thing and finally accept this or will they just go in full mope mode again

bet Ashley is quaking in his boots at that - Mind you will he/the club still be around then as they don't have the money at the moment to pay January salaries (if not December ones). Is Ashley going to keep 'loaning?' millions to the rangers after being issued with this complaint notice?

In case you are not aware of how message boards work, people post their opinions on things but, for you I'll try and remember to put IMO after all my posts to avoid my dizzy turns causing you grief. Interested to hear your opinion on the fact that your esteemed manager is now getting his full salary again. IMO this points to my view being correct

that would be hilarious and show the level of the man. He has spent the last 3 years with the dummy well and truly spat out and refuses to talk to the BBC

Nope

if he didn't want paid off he would already be out the door. the only reason he is not is because he wants his money, including the £400,000 he has deferred from his annual salary

Newcastle building society pays 2.54 at the moment

Can you read??? In case you missed it here is the bit I posted, yet again - Mrs Budge spent more time in her interview attacking Hearts fans than she did attacking celtic fans From this you can see that Mrs Budge is saying that Hearts have a problem and are trying to deal with it. She said that the fan arrested for sectarian abuse will be banned for life. So please where can you get that I am saying it is a one-way street> I detest the tiny band of mini-huns we have in our support but they are a dying breed thank God

sorry not got a clue what you are on about, I was replying to neilly71 and his wee smiley. Anyway, there is absolutely no point in discussing this further on here as it is just one long thread of whataboutery. Thankfully we don't have to put up with your 'fans' till next season, at least. Hopefully when that delightful day comes there will be a lot less of them at Tynecastle, if any at all

so no reaction to celtic fans actions then, ok all is well in your World and there are no issues to confront in Scottish football

that is what is wrong with this whole hysterical reaction from celtic and their pals in the media. Mrs Budge spent more time in her interview attacking Hearts fans than she did attacking celtic fans but all we hear from the mopes is how 'we' should get our own house in order' when that is exactly what mrs Budge said we will be doing. She just called for celtic to do the same. As for champagne charlie, what a pile of garbage from a guy who knows absolutely nothing about Scottish football. One of his points was it was Hearts fault for cutting the allocation to celtic?? I mean WTF?? We did not cut the allocation but, if we had, why would it be Hearts fault that celtic 'fans' ripped up seats

great statement from Mrs Budge and a totally predictable response from the mopes. Thankfully we don't have to put up with them again this season but, when we do get back up to the premiership, we have to, at the very least, cut their allocation to the bare minimum; although I would prefer to see them banned totally.

It gladdens my Heart that so many rangers supporters are concerned about the state of the Scottish game. For me the game is on the way up, we have Aberdeen, Dundee Utd and Hearts on the up and these are the clubs, plus Hibs, we need to be doing well as they are the ones that can attract reasonable crowds

sorry but that is such a racist comment I think I'll step out of this thread.

that's why I was asking as I have never heard of this case, or other cases like this. I have no idea how similar they are but, on the brief details given they do indeed have a few similarities. Did anything come out after the fact?

do you think Alex Salmond is right to question certain aspects of the TTIP agreement

It is hard for us in Scotland to get our heads round things like this as we live in a country where gun crime is almost non-existent. It has been stated on here that white on black crime is reported as hate crime while the other way round isn't and I have no idea if this is correct or not. I would ask Ormond how many instances there have been of black police officers shooting an unarmed white man? I would suspect none but I really don't know.

I sort of agree with you, in that the Smith challenge wasn't as bad as Miller's, but it was still a defo red card. As for the rangers chances, they practically all came from hoofs up the park, very little, if any, football was played by them.

I agree with you although the punishment that the SFA/SPFL? would say is they lose the 3 points and have to play again. It should definitely be awarded as a 3-0

I find the age stats astonishing and good to see Rangers fans on here share that view. How much longer can they afford to hold on to super Ally, ior is it really the case that they just can't afford to get rid of him? If he was such a super pure Rangers man surely he should be stepping down and getting back to QoS, not the football team

they got a replay as they won the first game. If they had lost it the result would have stood. Agree with someone else though, can't see why it wasn't awarded as a 3-0