RenfrewBlue

Nope. You keep saying you have done stuff but refuse to substantiate the assertion. It's because there is no proof. I don't see why one link posted here is so difficult. You're more then happy to condemn every other teams supporters but just can't clean your own house. It just proves your hypocrisy. Very few people on these boards refuse to condemn their own fans when it's deserved because they are generally decent folk. Why do you struggle so badly?

Deliberately twisting what was said to try and support your own agenda? Are you really Ek under another account?Saying nothing is not the same as commenting on the story and attempting to blame other folk for your clubs idiots. Unless you support Celtic apparently.

And there we have the normal Ek_celt response to any challenge. Avoid, deflect, ignore. So to summarise you claim you have condemned the idiots in the Celtic support, yet no-one has seen these posts. You won't point them out to prove me wrong and your cherry on the top is to blame me for your lack of evidence. Your a one man example of the Celtic Victim mentality at its worst. No idea why others think this sort of behaviour is sensible but there you go, each to their own. I prefer honesty, even if you don't like saying it.

I don't believe you have and continually fail to provide evidence of your supposed outrage and condemnation. There's no smear here. You're just an apologist for the scum element of the Celtic support. If you're happy with that then fine.

He didn't say or even imply that. Just you avoidingbthe fact that your double standards are showing, again.But you keep deflecting and maybe it'll all go away. Or not. Either way you can always just not answer simple questions.

No you don't. Provide some evidence if you can.None of my business? New excuse for not answering. Well done. You have more body swerves than Jinky. But as I said you're still not answering simple questions. Good day to you too.

Seems fair enough to get a booking for that but a red? Had he been booked before? That and referees are all w@nkers!

We've done this before Ek. The continual dance where you don't ever condemn the idiots because they're Sellick fans and just post drivel.It's there for all to see that you will never criticise a Celtic fan no matter what they've done. It's pathetic and your continuing attempts to look smart about it merely show up your immaturity. One day you'll grow up and realise why people don't give a toss about your opinion. Incidentally Celtic Fc have done well with their donation but it's still a bit limp that they don't have poppies on their strips. What possible reason is there for that?

Bizarre post. Both Ek and Wembley consistently defend anything to do with Celtic or their fans no matter what with never a criticism from them to the minority moron element in their support.I could name half a dozen Rangers fans on here who consistently slate the idiots that follow Rangers or the club when they feel it is deserved. You either cannot read or are just at it.

I think we need to organise the burning of The Queen and Princess Di. I wondered that would just be banter?

Rhodes has no right to moan. Hes not playing well just now, from what I've seen and is the wrong fit for our style. I wish folk would stop banging on about him. He's not really good enough.I feel sorry for Arfield though as by all accounts he's having another good season, although others have pointed out Burnley haven't won a game yet, so how good can he really be? Not seen Russell this season but never thought he was up to it when he was at Utd and getting over hyped so doubt he's up to it now. Happy to hear otherwise if I'm wrong.

How would you know, you've admitted to only seeing him play once. I've seen Pawlett 3 times and Jack twice so does that make me an expert on them?

Fairly accurate assessment I think.

You don't know what he looks like or where he plays but have decided on the basis of one game you saw he isn't good enough.You're no Bamber Gascoigne are you?

Burke shouldn't be there. He's mince. Always has been.All of the others barring Arfield aren't good enough or have had their chance and failed (I'm talking to you Adam!). Rhodes isn't a natural fit for our style of play so doesn't get picked which is right. Mcleod deserves a chance like Gauld because they both fit Strachans style.

What a clown you've made yourself look with this post.Bryson is in the squad and Rhodes wasn't left out for Mcleod as the boy is a central midfielder not a striker. I think you'll find Stevie May has Rhodes place, and so he should. He's a far better all round player. Just because Mcleod plays for Rangers the nuggets are out screaming he doesn't deserve to be in the squad. Pathetic as per from the usual morons. Anyone who's seen the boy play will know he's got the potential to be a top player. Add in he's left sided and can score a goal or two and we don't have many to compete with him. Having said that I'd have liked to see Arfield in the squad as he looks like he could step up quite easily into the team.

I'm surprised anyone could make out what the mentals were saying. I've heard chimps with better speech.God alone knows why you'd film that and then post it On YouTube! You'd need to be extra thpethial to think this game will be fun. I doubt we'll get hammered though as remember Mccoist studied under old Walter. We'll have 8 central defenders playing and it will be one of the worst footballing shows ever. It'll even make the other semi look good, which is a feat in itself.

Now that would be a cruel and unusual punishment.

Cmon be fair, he's being a total dick!

There must be more than the Aberdeen players word or he would have got the same as Boyd. Pointless arguing until the appeal is heard and the facts become clear. Innocent until proven guilty in this country and whilst the appeal is live he's not proven yet.

Strange that when Rangers are really struggling both on and off the pitch that the level of childish vitriol goes up. I'd have thought it would have been the other way about. Anyway, couldn't care less who we get in the semi as I think we are much weaker than all 3. Think we'll get well beaten by any of them. Defence is a lot better without Moshni but still not very good (how does Fostered get a game) and Aird doesn't want to take anyone on. Why he got the full game I don't know. Sometimes wonder is Ally needs his eyesight checked.

True but "he's no a Rangers man". Whatever that means. People forget that David Murray wasn't a Rangers supporter when came in.Boycotts etc won't stop him. He's proved that with Newcastle. I think I'll reserve judgement just now.

Nobody really knows as Ashley never talks to the press. We have no idea what his plans are or what the cash has been secured on.I don't think he'll get a good reception from the fans.

It does seem to be the in thing just now. Much better if everyone just stopped taking the stupid things to games and then they knuckledraggers would need to come up with a new "how stupid are we" contest.

Fair points but Ashley CAN'T own Rangers as he's not allowed to whilst owning Newcastle. So he wants control but not ownership. Cake and eat it scenario where if things go wrong he has little or no risk.If King allied to him then it may make Ashley more palatable to the support and make him a few quid in the process.