phart

and it happens again. Witnesses this time to gainsay his account this time though. On the Trump issue i saw all these memes about him and nukes, anyone thinking Clinton is any less inclined to use them hasn't been following her track record.

I didn't pick up the sarcasm to begin with, I was starting to think you might be mental, then it clicked lol

the regressive left culture has a lot to answer for... I see your boy got into another fight then gave testimony saying it wasn't his fault, this time there were witnesses though. "He claimed he was punched in the face by a white man in an orange shirt, who was drunk and who then hopped on a motorcycle. With the alleged attacker were four other men, according to Zimmerman, who threatened him. When asked what started the argument, Zimmerman responded, “He recognized me. He told me he was going to kill me. He told me he’d … shoot me and he punched me in the face.” But witnesses told police that the fight began because Zimmerman was bragging about killing Martin"

TRT Testosterone replacement therapy. was allowed in MMA for a while and the differences before and after are ostensibly huge. Obviously it isn't scientific but just watching folk before and after there is a huge drop of in performance, even ability to take a punch. Some folk just look so different as well, pretty funny the UFC has perhaps the most comprehensive anti-doping policy in sports, and considering who has popped and when, also seems very independent. Jon Jones pulled 2 days before headlining UFC 200 (biggest event to date) for testing positive for two estrogen blockers. Since it's came in most of the titles have changed hands. With clearance times in the hours any delay of giving a sample could be crucial.

That has crossed my mind.

My maw just got the train this morning down to her sisters, she got the train at St Pancreas to East Croydon and Jeremy Corbyn ended up sitting across from her as he was heading down to Brighton. Considering how much info she just gave me over the phone she must have talked the lugs off him.

Cause he "betrayed" gods messenger on earth for money?

I saw a programme about extreme marathon runners and they had Ridgebacks as pets that would go out with them when they trained and run the legs off their humans. My dads boss at work has a south African boerboel, another dog you don't threaten the owner of. He has brought him into work each day since a puppy (landscape gardening yard), smart as well, knows when everyones piece time is around the yard and wanders round to collect his "protection money".

Ridgeback's

Dog Trainer in Linlithgow has 3 of them, beautiful braw dugs.

Weirdly i was speaking to someone with a Northern Inuit on tuesday. If I had all the time and could pick I would get a pair of Basset Hounds.

We're not launching subs though, it's the delivery system and warhead that are the problem. Also the subs will probably be under NATO command at war anyway.,.

so to stop "cowering" you pay billions then you're the big man. Falling for the political example of dick enlarging pills adverts. It's pathetic. no nukes please.

I see they carried out the most comprehensive "wellbeing" psychological report and guess the top two occupations? social work and teaching.

Landis interview. http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/hell-always-have-paris-floyd-landis-returns-to-the-tour-de-france/

Is it not John Swinney doing this? Folk going on about someone having no kids or it's an indoctrination programme can be pigeonholed with those that think it's a wee bit of legislation and ignored on the subject. Those that worry about the implications for abuse of power, scapegoating , less government etc, or who think it will be good for protecting children is just a rubberstamp for existing practices can discuss it rationally. The people actually opposing it aren't opposed to the aims of the scheme merely the practices of it. The Christian Institute co-ordinated the legal action and director Colin Hart said after the decision was announced: “We all accept the good intentions behind this law but a universal data-gathering scheme like this was always going to cause major problems. I have no idea what mentalists you guys have been looking at, fortunately i haven't seen anything bar what's been reproduced here. Just ignore those folk they don't understand the subject.

Loads of testimony from whistleblowers and Dr ashenden that actually despite what Mathew Syned says they are terrified of coming forward. Actually most anti-doping is done by the police or whistleblowers. Festina was border controls, armstrong refused to give Landis a ride on his team so he grassed him up, then Lance came back and got caught. Beating the tests is the "easy" bit. or just get a TUE. Most major breakthroughs are normally someone speaking out.

Wow whistleblowers, trainers and everything are getting into Syned for his article. it seems those who have spent time trying to get a clean sport think it's harmful and ignorant.

Tucker replies, not read it yet (just about to, but putting it up first) http://sportsscientists.com/2016/07/fixed-matthew-syed-dismissal-whistleblower-fears/

So the existing processes must be illegal then as per the ruling yesterday?

I don't think this is an indoctrination programme to make folk vote for independence lol. It's a poorly developed idea which contravenes certain aspects of law, and totally underestimates the extra work already overworked people will have to do. Mainly the education sector which is already in the grip of a stress epidemic.

me and Brian smith

If we have similar schemes on the go, how do we know they aren't in breach of article 8 of ECHR? Have they been tested in the same manner, or just been arbitrarily created?

The facebook link above doesn't work for me. You're linking to a close grp on facebook, i fecked about a bit with the link to get access.

Reason has abandoned this place.