Langtonian

fools and their money would they not want to see the actual finances of the club before they commit or have they already done so?

why and whats the relevance? why and whats the relevance?I dont support any club in that no longer go to see them but lets just say the club I did go to see endeavours to pay its way and has had to make some hard decisions to do so unlike others who see the easy/ire way

i know where your coming from AA but thats no consolation to the ordinary persons that are struggling indirectly because of the banks.banks just crank up their repayments which they cant afford "badger you then we`ll have your house/business" there seems to a whole lot of sympathy shown towards football clubs/bigger businesses that dodge debt,tax repayments but very little afforded to the ordinary person no doubt farmer a very rich man will come out of this rubbing his hands? certainly not the £25 mill being quoted

it is if your a struggling home owner or a smaller business and threatened with the loss of your house/businesses, its pretty gauling to see deals done by banks with football clubs carrying huge debts because of overspending.if they cant afford to service their debt they should be treated the same as anyone else.cant pay we`ll take it away policy

it will prob amount to near £1m on games played i`d imagine which is decent money for an unproven player in the second tier of scottish football

pf course it makes a difference, if he has no time for the royal family he wont be upset at some booing of an anthem to a sponging unelected parasite FoS has been booed numerous times and does not put me up nor down i didnt vote to stay part of the union so do not need to accept what comes wth that booing GSTQ is quite joyous

should it not be well done to the taxpayer funded bank for halving their debt?it's seems to be alright for football clubs but not to the ordinary person who may well be behind with their mortgage or whatever.ordinary person cant pay they are turfed out their house

you wont be upset by the booing of GSTQ then?

totally misconception that some seem to trot out now and again

so instead of just paying a wage to a useless manager the rovers are now paying a wage on top of that for a director of football to oversee a useless manager why cant the board just not admit they made a cnut of extending the managers contract.?any other manager with murrays record would have been shown the door months ago

apparently lost the vote on a new share issue

a couple of quid a game

why cant some just accept that others dont see the carrot of midweek game against NI for free if you purchase a the three tickets for the qualifiers good value.if you cant or not interested in the NI game your only saving about a couple of quid purchasing all three in a oner

80 grand to Neil Alexander though Rangers prepared to go through a costly appeal

in a nutshell

no better time than now imo

why do the sfa just not come out and say we made major Cnut of our ticket pricing in the first instance?

with you redstevie

this

which means the tartan army or scotland international team

this

were the rangers not charging £18 when they were in the third division?

does he?it could depend what's in his contract

400k pay off or gardening leave.? if rangers are struggling to pay wages as it is why would sally accept gardening leave ?throw in possibly paying off the back room staff along with paying a new manager

why the interest and what difference does it make?