Scotty CTA

Looking good for The Famous to get a first round bye and be seeded for QR2. C'mon Spurs and Arsenal in EPL (if I'm following this correctly).

On the same basis that Rangers should be back where they belong.

Wee Cammy came on for Johnny after Hayes injured himself 2 1/2 seconds into the Final. (That's as close as we can get.)

I believe that Aberdeen, having the strongest co-efficient of the Cup 'Winners' in QR1, would get bumped up into QR2.

No, we'll be fine having earned the extra 2 weeks.

Then win the League, or the Scottish Cup, or pass FFP, or something...

Dons already considered Cup Winners by UEFA and could very well enter at the Europa League second round and potentially play the day after Celtic does (on July 13th).

Passing UEFA FFP (and silencing Anne Budge's objections to you taking Hearts' rightful place) would get you Europe.

Rangers (down 0-1) take off a forward for a defender.

It happens. We could have sold more than the 43,000 we did in 2014 (but weren't allowed to due to segregation).

Absolutely no need. (This type of 'cyberhurt' WILL NOT be tolerated on here.) (You could and should have taken the high road.) Ah... there's hope. Good. (Saves me putting you both in the cooler for the weekend.)

Can you imagine? (Be fair. That's never happened.) I had a tax deadline to deal with. Not only mine, but had the chore of having to through all of my dear Mum's effects also. When the Father says to me "Enter the land of joy, good and faithful servant", and then Jesus turns to you and says "Depart from me ye cursed. I never knew you" then you will absolutely know for certain which of us had the true relationship. God's Word never returns void.

There shouldn't be particular brands of Christianity, just Bible-believing Christianity. Jesus is pleased with those that take Him at His Word. Imagine that God is a 5,000 piece jigsaw puzzle and you as a mortal understand just one of those pieces. If I gave you one piece of a 5,000 piece jigsaw could you tell me the 'big picture' without seeing the box? Who would you be to tell God what is what about anything (considering that in reality He is a jigsaw puzzle of infinite pieces and your entire understanding wouldn't even add up to one piece?) Yes, unless of course one knowingly, willing rejects Him. Well, for starters... Jesus said... "And if your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than with two hands to go to hell, to the unquenchable fire." Mark 9:43 You sin... you go to hell. Who hasn't sinned? Only Jesus. So who needs a Saviour? Everyone. And who'll humble themselves? Not many.

No, I agree with God. No, I'm not pro any of those things. (Please explain.) The 613 commandments/rules to the Jews in the Old Testament were necessary to keep 'the least of peoples' intact through to the end of days. If God didn't set out such strict 'laws' to adhere to then the Jews would have melted/become extinct long ago.

Please see above. Again, please see the C.S.Lewis quote for the truth about The Truth.

They are supposed to be the same thing. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." John 1:1 Jesus is the 'Word'. So how do we know? Because the Bible explains the Bible. Just 13 verses later... "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth." John 1:14 The different directions seem to be that I take God at His Word, and you have worked your way to a conclusion that you are comfortable with. “I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.” C.S. Lewis (Mere Christianity)

And if you take away 'the troubles' where would 'you and them' be? (And why are we taking honours away? Lets take away your 9 in a row from your history for absolutely no reason. Fair? Of course not. We're third (with the most European trophies! )

Do you think you'll get a refund when you go udders up, or do you feel that you're pretty much kissing the money good-bye?

I don't see the problem. Bible-believing Christians believe the Word of God (to be the Word of God). The Jehovah's Witnesses (for example) have removed 47 verses that show Jesus to be God, and the Mormons (for example) have added a third Testament. Once a 'group' adds or subtracts from the Word of God then by definition they have disqualified themselves from being Bible-believing. (One of the reasons that I have quoted the Bible so much over the years is to show the consistency in what I believe compared to what the Bible says.)

Nope. Roman Catholicism is full-on man-made RELIGION compromised with paganism, with only a thin veneer of 'christianity' for the purpose of a deceptive appearance. You continue to just post off the top of your head. Bible-believing Christianity (by definition) can neither 'add' to nor 'omit' from God's Word. The 3rd and 4th last verses of the Bible from Revelation 22 are... 18 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. You can't get past 'Bible-believing' so you go off to 'non-Bible-believing' to get weak points wide of the mark which you then try to pass off as somehow being valid. (You are out of your depth.)

There were only promotions after 9/11. No one demoted, no one fired, and no one jailed.

Roman Catholic doctrine is hardly Bible-believing Christianity.

It would again be fact. Bible-believing Christians don't hate their enemies, let alone practice things like segregation, racism, sectarianism, genocide, etc.