thplinth's Content - Page 4 - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

thplinth

Member
  • Posts

    11,009
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by thplinth

  1. I dont really know if it is chripper or the same tedious cunt who has a boner for me and Scotty or some other mentalist. I've been the same poster on here since 2005. If I am an agent of anyone I am playing a hell of a long game. The fakes are above. Mostly all appeared post 2014.
  2. Possibly not but very possibly so... especially based on the last post above. Repetitive trolling and accusing me of wanting a hundred thousand people to die... while consistently being a war mongering cunt of the highest order.
  3. Well I guess that make you Victoriaaid Nulan then. 😀
  4. Even if you go for 100,000 dead soldiers on the Ukrainian side when you add in civilians it must be 10's of thousands more. So no longer really the thread for acting like a glib prick chripper. I don't think the pro-war crowd on here or in the wider world give a flying fuck about Ukrainians despite all the faux outrage and mock moral indignation... These are horrific numbers and this is just gearing up.
  5. Jeezo even Col Douglas MacGregor has the number of KIA Ukrainians at 100,000 and 300k-400k wounded. That is carnage.
  6. That is roughly the population of Aberdeen. The numbers seriously injured must be about 2-3 times that. Madness if true. edit: Seems too high. I think the Russian MOD said about 60,000 killed a little while ago. Still horrific.
  7. Oh I am sure they will get behind Rishi and do everything in their power to ensure his reign as PM is as successful as possible. They probably watch his leadership video every morning for that extra boost of inspiration before heading off to work. (Looks at Bongo.)
  8. And i use the term Tories here but really they bear little resemblance to the Tories of the Thatcher era... they are just the same neo-liberal, globalist, pro-war, unipolar, woke package that ALL the major political parties across Western Europe (and North America) offer now with few exceptions. And as Malcolm likes to mention all of them are strangely subservient to arsewipes like Klaus Schwab and his evil agenda. It is most peculiar and quite sinister.
  9. One thing I am almost certain of is the BBC and media would not be slaughtering the Tories like this if Corbyn was still the leader of Labour. But Sir Keir means they have a lock on in the next GE. Nothing but tories... So it allows them the freedom to put this crop of grasping incompetents to the sword without fear of a decent person being elected. Starmer seems to be the anointed one with the BBC etc paving his way with slaughtered tories. 😀 (Meaning he is almost certainly a Blair level cunt.)
  10. The reason he pulled out is in his statement. Boris Johnson has ruled himself out of the race to be the next Conservative Party leader and prime minister. Here is his statement in full: In the last few days I have been overwhelmed by the number of people who suggested that I should once again contest the Conservative Party leadership, both among the public and among friends and colleagues in Parliament. I have been attracted because I led our party into a massive election victory less than three years ago - and I believe I am therefore uniquely placed to avert a general election now. A general election would be a further disastrous distraction just when the Government must focus on the economic pressures faced by families across the country. I believe I am well placed to deliver a Conservative victory in 2024 - and tonight I can confirm that I have cleared the very high hurdle of 102 nominations, including a proposer and a seconder, and I could put my nomination in tomorrow. There is a very good chance that I would be successful in the election with Conservative Party members - and that I could indeed be back in Downing Street on Friday. But in the course of the last days I have sadly come to the conclusion that this would simply not be the right thing to do. You can't govern effectively unless you have a united party in parliament. And though I have reached out to both Rishi (Sunak) and Penny (Mordaunt) - because I hoped that we could come together in the national interest - we have sadly not been able to work out a way of doing this. Therefore I am afraid the best thing is that I do not allow my nomination to go forward and commit my support to whoever succeeds. I believe I have much to offer but I am afraid that this is simply not the right time. Bojo was ousted the first time because the tories did not close ranks and support him. Instead they backstabbed him like crazy out their own personal ambitions. For him to come back they would have had to do it (close ranks) as for sure the BBC and media cocksuckers would have been going straight back after him just like they did before. Old school tories would have closed ranks (the first time) and just rebuffed the media, this lot though... they are real vipers. They seemingly can't think about what is collectively smart. Sunak is fucked before he starts because he was one of the biggest vipers (not Gove level but getting there quick). With no mandate, no party unity, a lot of MP thinking he is a grade A cunt (which he clearly is) before he even starts... Johnson was their only slim chance to avoid an early GE but there is a reason this tory party is making such a mess of it, because they are a mess. I don't see given the first real crisis how Sunak will be any different to Truss however this is the last chance saloon now. What a shit show the tories are. I have been attracted because I led our party into a massive election victory less than three years ago Massive election victory less than 3 years ago... to this. I still can't hardly believe it myself. Imagine how Bojo must feel... 'How in the fuck...' 😀
  11. True but at a massive cost and especially if net-net the official decision making is not much better. And that massive cost was to footballs dynamism, its flow. VAR made football like American football with these long pauses every few minutes (very suitable for future advertising breaks BTW). Previously football was not like that it was far more dynamic and the ref did not substantially interfere with that. VAR gives teams breathers where before they would have been run ragged... It changed the whole dynamic of football. And that is what everyone said it would do. However we were told it would be worth it. It wasn't and isn't. I would use 'VAR' to weed out bent refs but after the fact. They'd soon get the message it was not worth it anymore and clean up their act IMHO.
  12. He was right about all the Satanists though. 😀 Jeezo... the amount of folk who seemingly worship the devil does make you wonder if the opposite exists. As a well considered agnostic I'd say it is the most compelling evidence out there for God... i.e. the sheer amount of Satanists at the highest levels. 😀 Because if the devil exists so must God.
  13. Back on topic. 'samP' (aye right|) has got the hump you called him a nonce. Did you even get a warning for that? 😀
  14. Bit like ordinary refereeing pre VAR then.😀
  15. 😀 No thanks. It always, every time, ends badly. I don't know if you have noticed but there are too many mad people attracted to this board for anything like that to be used properly. Look at the recurring troll posters. It is difficult to stop if people are determined. I am more than a little suspicious we have some multiple id's on the go, that was definitely happening last time the like/dislike buttons were activated, as well as previously banned folk coming back over and over. No criticism of the mods. I couldn't be arsed either, these folk are borderline mad, they are like a mental energizer bunnies that never stop.
  16. I'd be very curious to see the reactions on here if people started talking about the size of Nicola Sturgeon's tits and whether they would consider riding her or not. Incredible double standards. 😀
  17. If we make every election (Scottish and UK) a vote on Independence by making it the only stated policy in the SNP manifesto then... ...if we get 50%+ of the votes cast that is enough to legitimize our right to at least hold a referendum without the UK's approval nor agreement. ...if we achieve 50%+ of the entire electorate in an election then it legitimizes a UDI. You need to prove you have the mandate. You do that by making every election a referendum. (Those orange nutters will go berserk no matter how it is done. So fuck em.)
  18. Oh no i didn't forget. But in case you forgot almost all of that was done BEFORE he won a historic Thatcher like landslide GE. That's the British public for you. This makes Bojo the only one among them who can claim to have any kind of mandate from the public. You recognize it yourself. Which is why he might well get his job back. I don't see how the tories have much alternative at this stage. Unless the slithery one makes his move. (shudder)
  19. That was a bit rubbish to be honest. 😀 I've been sitting here for months as the UK lurches into the biggest economic and social crisis since the 70's and during the whole period we have been effectively without a functioning PM. How long did it take to select the wally that was Truss. It went on forever and now look at the raging bin fire she has left behind. And over what exactly? Some parties during lockdown and people not wearing masks? ooooOOOooooo whoopy fucking doo. 😀 Well ok if you think that was so grave a crime that it was worth all of this chaos during a time when we really needed a functioning PM (yes even Johnson is better than nothing and a lot better than Truss or any of the other arsehole candidates we saw) then that is your view, not mine though. We are stuck with these ghouls until the next GE and looking at the choices on offer as PM who is less worse than Johnson? All this over a few fucking parties... madness.
  20. Oh right, I probably should have expanded it then. 😀
  21. I am not sure what (in the post you quoted) drew out this question but you don't think it was possible for her to do anything else? Wrong thread, but I can think of one thing in particular she could have done differently, that would have changed a lot IMHO.
  22. It was the media who got rid of Johnson. The BBC in particular was relentless in this regard... I still don't understand what they hoped to achieve in doing that. It decapitated the UK of any real leadership (which is far worse than Johnson believe it or not). The BBC (news) really is a very nasty and destructive organization, very anti-british in many ways. The removal of Johnson was the mistake, the aberration, putting him back merely reverses it but the problem is you can't put all the toothpaste squeezed out in the intervening period back in the tube. He will have to work with the people dancing in his grave not that long ago and trying out his PM chair for size. But if anyone has the brass neck for it it is Bojo. He will relish it. Johnson for his part is affable. None of the others are, not even remotely. The tories have a real problem brewing there - serious lack of talent on the bench. And as bad as it is for the tories it is FAR worse for the SNP. Sturgeon has never faced any competition as leader, nothing and she instinctively surrounds herself with people less competent than herself. And she has stocked the upper echelons of the SNP with total dickheads. The state of political parties in the UK is shocking right now and I think it is really starting to show... we are now a basket case country. Look a the nick of us.
×
×
  • Create New...