antidote

Jeremy Corbyn. Then there's the brexit thingy.

I find that some don't like her because they've basically been told by the London based press not to like her. It was the same with Alex Salmond. When you pushed them on why they didn't like him, the stock answer came back, 'Cos I jist dinnae like him.'

I'm sure you'll do a good job in bring him around to his senses.

Just a wee look at his background on wiki should tell you he's a red hot tory. "Robinson was a founder-member of Macclesfield Young Conservatives (YC) and rose through the ranks, becoming Cheshire YC Chairman (1982–84) and became a key activist in the moderate-controlled North West Area organisation. Philip Pedley, as National YC Chairman, co-opted Robinson onto the YC National Advisory Committee in 1983 and appointed him National Campaign Director of Youth for Multilateral Disarmament. Robinson was elected National Vice Chairman in 1985–87 and succeeded a fellow moderate, Richard Fuller, when he was elected Chairman of the National Young Conservatives on the moderate ticket against strong right-wing opposition (1987–88).[6] At university he was President of the Oxford University Conservative Association in 1985.[7][8]"

Then there's this from a few years back. Which will suit the conspiracy theorists nicely. http://www.globalresearch.ca/deleted-daily-mail-online-article-us-backed-plan-for-chemical-weapon-attack-in-syria-to-be-blamed-on-assad/5339178

Most of this I agree with, but this reason (bold) is exactly what the Labour, Tory and LibDems parties attacked the SG for, especially prescription charges.

Did the Scottish branch of the labour party not vote against free school meals for children in Scotland? That was not only on the telly, but it is also recorded in Holyrood. Does he want it for kids who's parents are relatively well off also? I'm sure there are some children, even in deprived areas, whose parents make a decent living. Sort of puts labour's faux outrage into perspective when they were chuntering on about free prescriptions and freezing of the CT helping the well off. Totally agree with your last sentence, promise the earth out of power, its an old labour habit.

Heard on TV it was only free school meals for children in deprived areas.

#prayforstrachan

Yer no. Simple being the operative word for you

Google it. Yep, me and Stu meet up all the time when I'm down in Bath.

I'm away oot, so don't think I'm ignoring you girls.

You would see things like that. You not answering anything It's pretty obvious you have no idea.

Nope, no answer then.

Coming from you, I'll take that as joke. What is it they say about playing the man?

Watch now, you'll get the correction police onto you now.

What could you not make up then Neil? I think the TAMB jury found your claim unproven.

Care to say what I made up?

Not like you not to try and point score over anything. Notice how you conveniently left out the rest of the sentence. Still smarting over your stupid claims about Stu Campbell being a misogynist? No wonder he blocked you.

Like aaid said, the last tweets are totally unacceptable and should be rightly condemned by everyone. I also agree with aaid on the wings tweet, it is not offensive. I'm sure that the unionists offensive tweets are far more numerous to the offensive tweets from a nationalists, but this doesn't excuse the offensive tweets that do come from the nationalist side and they should rightly be bollocks for tweeting them.

You're more than welcome to produce some of those attacks from the other side and I will condemn them as much as I condemn the ones I've posted. I don't do twatter, I only get these from websites/threads etc, so I don't get the full picture of what has been said on the nationalist side. If you have any copy them on this thread, or it may just looks as though your'e apologising for the unionists actions. .

This from a zoomer over on the Herald comments tonight. Stephen Doyle Peter Piper7:46pm Wed 22 Mar 17 "You are that contemptible person Peter. You are an apologist for the SNP and their viperous attacks on the the UK government and the personalities involved. The terrorists involved in today's attacks don't evolve in a vacuum, they take their cues and justifications from many sources. Some people might think that today's attack was just a coincidence that it occurred, contemporaneously, with the SNPs referendum debate. You will probably maintain that theory Peter, but, you will not be able to prove it either, as the main attacker is dead. Your crocodile tears do you no favours."

Then there's this twat, tweeting this then deleting it very quickly. https://twitter.com/Macnessie/status/844629342177120259/photo/1

Yes, by the Met chief of counter terrorism in his press conference.