vanderark14
-
Posts
14,020 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
44
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Tartan Army Message Board News
Media Demo
Posts posted by vanderark14
-
-
https://www.afc.co.uk/2024/04/10/club-statement-video-assistant-referees/
The VAR guessed he was offside. WOW
-
3 minutes ago, Big Ramy 1314 said:
You really are one thick fuck.. You and I have never gotten along, but your above post about me is out of order. There is no gloating when it comes to child abuse....
I have an "issue"...??? Coming from the Gestapo of the TAMB? Get a life ya prick... I'm sure I'll be banned for this... Oh well...
Who said you were gloating? I think you need to read my post again. You can apologise once you realise I never said you were gloating
EDIT - If you do get banned, you would absolutely deserve it because not once did I say you were gloating. You read my post incorrectly and have once again flown completely off the handle with a ton of personal abuse
-
41 minutes ago, Hertsscot said:
You're right, it is a big story. I don't know enough about the links between the Boys Club and the Football Club to have an informed opinion but there have been sexual predators preying on boys at several clubs. Hopefully we're all a bit better informed nowadays and more aware but no body should be complacent.
Same here, I don't know enough about the links but Celtic look set to pay out a lot of money. The quicker they do it the better it will be for them and the victims
-
Just now, Big Ramy 1314 said:
I'm not the one who needs help fella... Own up to it !!!
I've nothing to own up to.
If my posts upset you this much, you can always ignore me. and please don't pretend you are not upset, that last post aimed at me was a clear indication that you have some issue which you need to address. I don't care what they are but you should seek help to address them. Nobody can be than abusive day in day out unless there is an underlying issue for it
-
44 minutes ago, EddardStark said:
What a farce. Sky must be thinking we are total amateurs . Probably middle of next week now and it will interesting to see what Motherwell and Hibs think about it as Dundee will effectively know what they need to do in terms of results.
I only ever see Rangers fans worrying about what sky think. Fuck them
-
24 minutes ago, Big Ramy 1314 said:
Listen you ignorant fuck !! I was only pointing out that YOU are the only one who posts about this, like it gives you a hard on !!
I have 2 sons. The worst thing a human being can ever do in life is touch a child.. Anyone ever touched either one of my boys, I would gladly go to prison for the rest of my life.. You do not want to know what I would do to the person responsible.
I hope to God that these predators who abused these boys are hammered, and justice is done to the victims. Whether it be paid money, counselling, I don't know.
Don't you ever post that I glorify in something so painful and horrific..
Gob Bless all the victims.....
WTF are you on about
Seek help - immediately
-
13 minutes ago, Hertsscot said:
Fair point. What is sad is the gloating from other fans. The suffering caused by the sexual abuse of children is too important to be trivialised and sadly perpetrators of such abuse are not restricted to certain football clubs, religions or political parties.
I have no doubt there is gloating going on, Ramy likes to think thats what everyone is doing when they discuss this topic but its not the case.
-
13 minutes ago, Squirrelhumper said:
On subject of McBurnie, if folk are remembering him being anything other than shite in a Scotland shirt, then they are kidding themselves on.
a few goals for a shite EPL side tends to change minds 😂
-
55 minutes ago, LoganRoy said:
11am pitch inspection passed.
The rain is on, and another inspection at 3.30pm.
I can already feel the staunch anger simmering 🤣
-
1 hour ago, Malcolm said:
🤣🤣🤣. I’m glad to see that I am not the only one that could be accused of trolling around here.
I wasn't trolling. I posted a relevant news story.
-
9 minutes ago, noctonjock said:
Goal for Che Adams tonight .
He's now scored 1 every 3 matches this season. 2 in his last 3
That's the kind of form we need to see in the run up to the euros
-
24 minutes ago, dan cake said:
Anything happening, is the Swedish dude still favourite?
Nobody has a clue mate. 😆 🤣 😂
-
2 minutes ago, EddardStark said:
I honestly don't know why Hibs and Hearts do this to themselves and why the SFA allow it.
There is simple solution when facing one of the OF at hampden.
1. 50/50 split is agreed at the start
2. The NOn OF team is given a deadline to sell their allocation
3. They sell each section on at a time
4. If the deadline date is reached and the Non OF side have not sold their allocation, their remaining tickets go to the OF club.
Its not rocket surgery
-
20 minutes ago, EddardStark said:
Apparently Hearts will be hit for £100k by the SFA if they don’t sell their remaining semi final ticket allocation.
Where did you read this?
-
7 minutes ago, Fairbairn said:
And more importantly, the laws of the game!
Like the law being quoted above which is subjective, nobody with 100% certainty can say the tackle was reckless, careless or excessive force
-
Just now, Big Ramy 1314 said:
Wrong, you are the only one who posts this, well yir pal Rolling Hills.. Well done, proud of yourself???
Super proud of myself, thanks.
-
58 minutes ago, scotlad said:
I don't think a swap is necessary, assuming we go with three centre-forwards. Gauld would offer something different from most of our other midfielders. He has pace, can beat a man and can run with the ball. I actually see him as more of a forward.
The two recent friendlies have shown that we are slightly one-paced in attack and it was clear against Northern Ireland in particular that we struggle to break down teams that sit in and defend. Someone like Gauld who can put in a cross or thread a pass through - or score a goal himself - would be a valuable asset.
It's an academic debate thought, because there's virtually no chance of him being called up. If Clarke was convinced by him I am sure he would have been called up already.
This
I trust that clarke has been keeping tabs on Gauld, maybe Clarke thinks Gauld just isn't good enough
-
1 minute ago, EddardStark said:
Certainly careless. He left high leg high and he left it hanging and Silva did what most players would do. Ran through it.
Disagree, in slow motion thats what it looks like. In real time he is falling over - not being careless. Beaton saw half a video in slow motion and fell for it, I actually feel for him because his first instinct was correct - book Fabio for cheating...again
-
2 minutes ago, Big Ramy 1314 said:
You are a right fuckin cnut you are. Just can't wait to post stuff like this ! You always have in the past... What is the point of this???
I actually did think about not posting it but then I thought why not? Its news about a scottish club, its not a banned topic and I couldn't care less what you think
Some of us don't have agendas when posting, some of us can discuss topic without throwing the toys out of the pram every day
-
Just now, EddardStark said:
"Under Law 12, a foul should be given when a player “tackles an opponent to gain possession of the ball, making contact with the opponent before touching the ball." That would suggest Johnston would be in the clear as he did appear to make contact with the ball first.
- there is a caveat if the defending player is deemed “careless, reckless, or using excessive force.”
do you think the tackle was “careless, reckless, or using excessive force.”
-
Under IFAB rules, a challenge can still be a penalty if the defending player gets the ball first and the officials deem the tackle to be careless, reckless or has excess force.
Celtic obviously seeking clarity, for once I understand why they are asking for clarity. Usually i would put it down to appeasing their fan base but i think clarity is required.
I don't think the tackle was careless, reckless and there definitely wasn't excess force
-
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-68766858
Solicitors say "significant progress" has been made towards Celtic settling legal claims of historical abuse, for what the BBC understands could be millions of pounds.
-
11 minutes ago, EddardStark said:
Why is so hard for ex pros plus Michael Stewart to understand that a defender can get a touch on a ball but if they kick a player in the same action a pen can be given? Why do they think their view trumps that of experienced ex refs, most pundits and general sensible objective fans ?
Still waiting for you to tell me which law you were referring to specifically
-
51 minutes ago, bdgsct said:
Dykes/mcburnie comparison was based on similar style of play, i doubt he'll take both. Shankland a different kind of striker and whilst I'd take him I don't think he's doen enough to be guaranteed.
Shankland will be expected to play the lone forward role with supports from the AM's the same as Dykes and Adams
Season 23/24
in Football related - Discussion of non TA football
Posted
I started thinking they could move it across the road but then I guess United don't have VAR