aaid Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 6 minutes ago, duncan II said: Not even a foul in my day. It’s the laws of the game that are in place today that are applied, not whatever they were 50 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu101 Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 36 minutes ago, dandydunn said: A journalist attempting to invent a racism accusation here? Thats a bit of a mad take there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncan II Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, aaid said: It’s the laws of the game that are in place today that are applied, not whatever they were 50 years ago. My day wasn’t 50 years ago. Do I look that old? Anyway, I’m a Wolves man. Scottish club football a joke. Ever thus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandydunn Posted October 3, 2021 Author Share Posted October 3, 2021 6 minutes ago, Stu101 said: Thats a bit of a mad take there. Utterly incredible and a very silly thing to suggest against anyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrisandmoo Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 Yeah not a red for me. I don't see how a tackle that doesn't make contact with the opposing player (or even come close) and is executed well at high speed = a red card. Aribo should have been booked for playacting regardless of what you think about Porteous' tackle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumnio Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 52 minutes ago, dandydunn said: A journalist attempting to invent a racism accusation here? Is he Celtic minded, or just daft? That makes absolutely zero sense, what a complete fucking idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumnio Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 Porteous is maybe a red, maybe a yellow. Definitely not a scandalous decision to send him off anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debian Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 34 minutes ago, duncan II said: There really is noth Me too. Seen them given to dirty huns, not to anyone else. No wonder Debian was feart to post the video, (not actually watched yet) What the fuck are you on about? I hadn't commented on it let alone feart to post the video. FWIW, VAR in Scottish Football sends him off. You mad tin foil fud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dj mick Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 4 hours ago, dandydunn said: hopefully 4 hours ago, Big Ramy 1314 said: That is assault with a weapon. Ban for life and fined approximately l... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncan II Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 11 minutes ago, Debian said: FWIW, VAR in Scottish Football sends him off. You mad tin foil fud. Insult? You ugly, smelly, bigoted hun cunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 23 minutes ago, Morrisandmoo said: Yeah not a red for me. I don't see how a tackle that doesn't make contact with the opposing player (or even come close) and is executed well at high speed = a red card. Aribo should have been booked for playacting regardless of what you think about Porteous' tackle. Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play. https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 Looks like the right decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairbairn Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 I think someone might have some issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandydunn Posted October 3, 2021 Author Share Posted October 3, 2021 23 minutes ago, kumnio said: Is he Celtic minded, or just daft? That makes absolutely zero sense, what a complete fucking idiot. Celtic minded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandydunn Posted October 3, 2021 Author Share Posted October 3, 2021 17 minutes ago, dj mick said: What happened here? 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandydunn Posted October 3, 2021 Author Share Posted October 3, 2021 9 minutes ago, duncan II said: Insult? You ugly, smelly, bigoted hun cunt. Someone needs to put the bottle down I think……. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncan II Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 Just now, dandydunn said: Someone needs to put the bottle down I think……. 😄 I hate them. I hate them so much. I hated the original club. I hated their bigotry, their horrible fans, their cheating. The spittle dribbling from their mouths. I hated the board, the management, everything. then they died. Then a new club began. And the bigoted, horrible, smelly fans with no club attached themselves to that new one. Now they have all the same failings and horribleness as the old one PLUS an added sense of grievance for some bizarre reason. I don’t drink. I hate them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrisandmoo Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 (edited) 36 minutes ago, aaid said: Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play. https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct That's what I'm saying. He's not lunged at or endangered an opponent. Who do you think has been lunged at or put in danger. Not Aribo surely? He nowhere near him. Edited October 3, 2021 by Morrisandmoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddardStark Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 14 minutes ago, Morrisandmoo said: That's what I'm saying. He's not lunged at or endangered an opponent. Who do you think has been lunged at or put in danger. Not Aribo surely? He nowhere near him. Why did he make that lunge then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 13 minutes ago, Morrisandmoo said: That's what I'm saying. He's not lunged at or endangered an opponent. Who do you think has been lunged at or put in danger. Not Aribo surely? He nowhere near him. Porteous isn’t in control, if he makes full contact then there’s a very good chance of Aribo being seriously injured, the fact that he didn’t get injured isn’t at all relevant. It’s perfectly possible to execute a safe and legal slide tackle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrisandmoo Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, EddardStark said: Why did he make that lunge then? To take control of the space and win the ball? You see it all the time - usually at the sideline when a player slides in and fires the ball out the park. If another players is not in genuine danger from the tackle, then you cannae be sending folk off for sliding in quickly and winning the ball cleanly imo. Edited October 3, 2021 by Morrisandmoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddardStark Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 Just now, Morrisandmoo said: To take control of the space and win the ball? You see it all the time - usually at the sideline when a player slides in and fires the ball out the park. If another players is not in genuine danger from the tackle, then you cannae be sending folk off for sliding in quickly and winning the ball cleanly imo. It’s not a controversial decision. I doubt Hibs will appeal it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrisandmoo Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 3 minutes ago, aaid said: Porteous isn’t in control, if he makes full contact then there’s a very good chance of Aribo being seriously injured, the fact that he didn’t get injured isn’t at all relevant. It’s perfectly possible to execute a safe and legal slide tackle. If he had slid into my living room and made contact with my face I would also be seriously injured. As it happens, he kept well away from my living room and targeted the ball instead. It was confusing that Aribo was rolling about in an uncontrolled fashion right enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrisandmoo Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 5 minutes ago, EddardStark said: It’s not a controversial decision. I doubt Hibs will appeal it. Nah i don't think it's that controversial either to be honest. Just not a red for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Scot Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 If Porteous connects with the ball with his foot then its not even a foul. As it was though he didnt, his foot was over the top of the ball, straightish leg and is a red card. One of the worst things about fans and pundits is that they dont know the rules. They apply what they want the rules to be rather than what they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.