Scotland starting XI vs Czech Republic - Page 5 - TA specific - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Scotland starting XI vs Czech Republic


Taylor1996

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Texas Pete said:

Looks like we’re back to a back 4. 

Chripper meltdown is coming shortly. 

It is what it is.

We'll either win 0-1 with a flukey goal of we'll win 0-5.

Either way, people will say that this is our best system and we have a strong midfield. Irrespective of the fact we're playing Czech D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Taylor1996 said:

It is what it is.

We'll either win 0-1 with a flukey goal of we'll win 0-5.

Either way, people will say that this is our best system and we have a strong midfield. Irrespective of the fact we're playing Czech D.

The formation isn’t confirmed yet but if it isn’t a back 4 then Palmer is either playing in the back 3 or is playing as a right wing back. Either choice doesn’t fill me with confidence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Texas Pete said:

I hope the rumour that Palmer is playing in a back 3 isn’t true. We’ll find out soon enough I suppose. 

If Robertson bombs forward and we are controlling the game then Palmer would naturally move across. Vice versa if Palmer gets forward. I would expect the opposite full back to always tuck in as the central defense covered the vacant space. If our full backs are able to stay up the park then it'll only be a back 4 if we are out of possession and being pressed back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Texas Pete said:

The formation isn’t confirmed yet but if it isn’t a back 4 then Palmer is either playing in the back 3 or is playing as a right wing back. Either choice doesn’t fill me with confidence. 

Cannot see it being three at the back. Robertson stated the other day he cannot play as wing-back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ceudmilefailte said:

I know Palmer has been getting drilled as a wing back at Wednesday but surely that's a back four.

You’d think so.

Tonight we have an unexpected chance of victory so there should be no fannying about. Keep it simple. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Caledonian Craig said:

Cannot see it being three at the back. Robertson stated the other day he cannot play as wing-back.

Yeah I hope so. 

Surely the only point in playing 3 at the back was to accommodate Tierney who isn’t starting tonight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, killiefaetheferry said:

If Robertson bombs forward and we are controlling the game then Palmer would naturally move across. Vice versa if Palmer gets forward. I would expect the opposite full back to always tuck in as the central defense covered the vacant space. If our full backs are able to stay up the park then it'll only be a back 4 if we are out of possession and being pressed back.

Now that would really be a collector's item.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...