sbcmfc Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 22 hours ago, Farcity said: The main difference there is that Lawell has his bumchums in the Record and the Sun who do all his mouthing for him, to pretend this isn't the case is just plain silly. Your lot and the Huns are exactly the same thing. This 100% A great example being the week of coverage Ryan Bowman got for a challenge on Rangers Fabio Cardoso in the cup semi, including Brendan Rodgers; who didn’t talk about other teams or their players, wading in. We then went on to get shafted by refs against Celtic twice in a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanderark14 Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 On 12/27/2019 at 11:37 AM, dandydunn said: Lennon greeting about it and saying he should be brought to take over it, despite them doing it for years. Several Celtic fans on twitter seem to agree with Cormack and say their fed up seeing Ajer play acting as he’s good enough to be better than that. Notice Lennon and the media kept quiet on the Griffiths stamp. Wonder why that is? And now Celtic release a statement asking for fairness and consistency................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandydunn Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 1 hour ago, vanderark14 said: And now Celtic release a statement asking for fairness and consistency................... But, but....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auchinyell Sox Change Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 Someone / something i read put me right on this quite recently; i was always of the opinion ( and the practice ) of that 100% of the ball is perfectly legal i cant recite the rule tho but had seen was not the case ; and beenthat way for a while i recall an 80s game where spurs played on touchline was tackled by wimbledon player ; pretty sure was all ball contact but intent and force behind it was penalised jones / mabbutt is in my mind ; but not sure if those for sure not saying was same as Sams tackle tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 27 minutes ago, Auchinyell Sox Change said: Someone / something i read put me right on this quite recently; i was always of the opinion ( and the practice ) of that 100% of the ball is perfectly legal i cant recite the rule tho but had seen was not the case ; and beenthat way for a while i recall an 80s game where spurs played on touchline was tackled by wimbledon player ; pretty sure was all ball contact but intent and force behind it was penalised jones / mabbutt is in my mind ; but not sure if those for sure not saying was same as Sams tackle tho Law 12- Fouls and Misconduct Under this law, touching the ball is irrelevant. It isn't even mentioned in the law. Except if it is a handball incident. Touching all, or any, of the ball should have no bearing on whether the ref decides if a tackle is careless, reckless, or using excessive force. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auchinyell Sox Change Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, Orraloon said: Law 12- Fouls and Misconduct Under this law, touching the ball is irrelevant. It isn't even mentioned in the law. Except if it is a handball incident. Touching all, or any, of the ball should have no bearing on whether the ref decides if a tackle is careless, reckless, or using excessive force. Thanks , thats the one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.