Women's World Cup Finals - Page 10 - TA specific - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Women's World Cup Finals


TAMB2

Recommended Posts

On 6/10/2019 at 10:08 PM, RenfrewBlue said:

So Burnley should be forced to pay less than Rangers or Celtic because of their shite crowds? 

Utterly stupid comparison. 

Burnley leech off of the big teams in the EPL, so why should they be treated equally? 

We currently live in an era of positive discrimination because quite a lot of men think women are somehow inferior and need forced to engage anything other than their cock for thinking. 

If you don't understand this you're an idiot. If you want it abolished you're a sexist. If you don't like that, stop being so stupid. 

 

15 hours ago, RenfrewBlue said:

The bit above isn't relevant when you compare it to men's football, which you did,as did a couple of others. 

You really have a wee bee in your bonnet about the positive discrimination thing. 

Did a woman beat you to a job then? Is that the problem?

 

45 minutes ago, RenfrewBlue said:

Oh dear. You really are off on one. 

Would you compare amputee or blind football to international men's football? 

What about walking football? Only a few rule changes so its very similar. 

What about u14 boys? They follow exactly the same rules? 

I know you don't accept making mistakes, being wrong or even alternative views but your argument seems mince to me? 

It is pretty obvious who is upset and who is off on one here judging by your posts to me from the start. I'll leave you to it before you burst into tears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, thplinth said:

 

 

It is pretty obvious who is upset and who is off on one here judging by your posts to me from the start. I'll leave you to it before you burst into tears.

Typical response from someone who can't make a cogent argument. 

You can fantasise that I'm upset all you like. It doesn't make it true. 

I've enjoyed your responses though because at least you've shown some emotion for a change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the abuse and comments thplinth is on the end off is quite funny. 

People are arguing that the mens games financial rewards should be used to subsidise the womens because of equality. 

Yet when you equate the womens game to the mens, it’s not fair. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kumnio said:

I think the abuse and comments thplinth is on the end off is quite funny. 

People are arguing that the mens games financial rewards should be used to subsidise the womens because of equality. 

Yet when you equate the womens game to the mens, it’s not fair. 

Who’s arguing that the men’s game should subsidies the women’s game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, kumnio said:

I think the abuse and comments thplinth is on the end off is quite funny. 

People are arguing that the mens games financial rewards should be used to subsidise the womens because of equality. 

Yet when you equate the womens game to the mens, it’s not fair. 

I haven't seen anyone say that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, kumnio said:

I think the abuse and comments thplinth is on the end off is quite funny. 

People are arguing that the mens games financial rewards should be used to subsidise the womens because of equality. 

Yet when you equate the womens game to the mens, it’s not fair. 

No one has said anything like what you've asserted. 

And abuse? Perhaps read the posts thplinth has made before talking rubbish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...