Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Malcolm

First 11

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, ceudmilefailte said:

Been saying it for years, our over reliance on experience is holding us back big style Berra is not as good as mulgrew and hasn't been involved with the new younger players.so why bring him back, I would sooner give the experience of being away for a week to some one who will need it in the future.  Naismith and fletcher were in the squad to play, not just for the sake of it.

 

He hasn’t been involved with Souttar? 🤔

Personally I wouldn’t have Berra back in the squad either if everyone else is fit but don’t be surprised to see him called up if we have some injury issues in central defence. 

Naismith was a list minute replacement for McBurnie so he probably wasn’t going to start until McLeish saw him in training. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ceudmilefailte said:

How many times have they been on international duty together? Souttar and Berra?

None but they have played together plenty of times at Hearts. A good club partnership can transfer well to international football. Surely you can see that?

If we have injury call offs in central defence next year then I wouldn’t be surprised if McLeish called up Berra to partner Souttar. That’s all I’m saying. I hope to god it doesn’t happen but it’s possible and I would probably rather that than throwing Ryan Porteous or someone in against France or Spain etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

                                         McGregor

                          Bates.     Souttar.     McKenna.  

     Phillips                                                                        Tierney

                               McGregor        Robertson

                             Forrest.                     Fraser

                                             Fletcher.

OR

                                          McGregor

                            Bates.     Souttar.     McKenna.  

     Phillips                                                                        Tierney

                           Fraser.  Robertson. McGregor.   

                                    Forrest.   Fletcher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/23/2018 at 2:39 PM, Texas Pete said:

 

Apart from playing Fraser and Forrest on the wrong positions, I’d have to agree.  😂

Should Souttar walk straight back into the starting 11 though? Bates didn’t do anything wrong and could be playing in the Bundesliga next season. His inexperience does worry me a bit though. It’s a tough one.

Cairney is also a possibility (assuming he ever gets fit and actually wants to play for us).

 

True I don’t think anyone should walk straight back who weren’t involved in the last 2 games. Cairney could be useful for us but not sure if he’s fully committed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/25/2018 at 10:27 AM, bigfingers said:

True I don’t think anyone should walk straight back who weren’t involved in the last 2 games. Cairney could be useful for us but not sure if he’s fully committed. 

A lot can change in 3 months.

It is likely that at least 1 of the 11 that started the last 2 matches won't be available next time we play.

Players that missed out through injury this time should come back in if their form merits it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't play Tierney at right back unless we're utterly desperate. It kills the entire flank as he can't go forwards on that side. Certainly against the three smaller sides I'd go with O'Donnell.

Other than that, same team as for the last two, tho it would be nice to have Mulgrew and Souttar available, in case of form.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/4/2018 at 12:39 PM, andyD said:

I can't play Tierney at right back unless we're utterly desperate. It kills the entire flank as he can't go forwards on that side. Certainly against the three smaller sides I'd go with O'Donnell.

Other than that, same team as for the last two, tho it would be nice to have Mulgrew and Souttar available, in case of form.

It’s not too bad with Tierney at right back as Forrest is right footed and gives an option on the outside. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/4/2018 at 12:39 PM, andyD said:

I can't play Tierney at right back unless we're utterly desperate. It kills the entire flank as he can't go forwards on that side. Certainly against the three smaller sides I'd go with O'Donnell.

 

Not sure a 26 year old with 50 top flight games is the way ahead.

Prefer to give Tierney a chance to gain experience at right back against the smaller teams

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/6/2018 at 5:40 PM, er yir macaroon said:

It’s not too bad with Tierney at right back as Forrest is right footed and gives an option on the outside. 

Forrest can overlap, but Tierney can't. That's where the problem comes. If the fullback can overlap and cross, then Forrest can cut in and look to get on the end of a delivery, where as with only Forrest being able to overlap we become predictable and easier to stop. In the games where Tierney played right back, our right flank didn't really exist as an attacking force. O'Donnell's not SO bad defensively that it's worth sacrificing the attacking ability of 2 players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, andyD said:

Forrest can overlap, but Tierney can't. That's where the problem comes. If the fullback can overlap and cross, then Forrest can cut in and look to get on the end of a delivery, where as with only Forrest being able to overlap we become predictable and easier to stop. In the games where Tierney played right back, our right flank didn't really exist as an attacking force. O'Donnell's not SO bad defensively that it's worth sacrificing the attacking ability of 2 players.

The point i’m making is that with a left footer there is no need to overlap . It’s an inverted full back rather than the commonly employed inverted winger. Not ideal be any means, especially defendly but an in swinging cross is at least a lot easier. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, andyD said:

Forrest can overlap, but Tierney can't. That's where the problem comes. If the fullback can overlap and cross, then Forrest can cut in and look to get on the end of a delivery, where as with only Forrest being able to overlap we become predictable and easier to stop. In the games where Tierney played right back, our right flank didn't really exist as an attacking force. O'Donnell's not SO bad defensively that it's worth sacrificing the attacking ability of 2 players.

Patterson is  a better right back than O'Donnell and contributes far more in defensive  and attacking at set pieces. He is also 2 years younger and has nearly four times as many appearances at a reasonably high level. He has more international experience to boot. I don't understand why this is up for discussion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think I will continue my total back track on what I have said for three years about Patterson not being a right back by pointing out that Forrest has had his two best games by the proverbial mile with Patterson in behind him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/14/2018 at 6:38 PM, ceudmilefailte said:

Patterson is  a better right back than O'Donnell and contributes far more in defensive  and attacking at set pieces. He is also 2 years younger and has nearly four times as many appearances at a reasonably high level. He has more international experience to boot. I don't understand why this is up for discussion.

Genuine question but were you upset when we brought a young Manchester Utd player called Darren Flecther into the first team and kept him there after only a handful of appearances for his club ?

The amount of poxy "appearances at a high level" never tell the whole story. There's so much more to it than that. Players should never have to hit a "magic number" of appearances before playing international football. What an utterly bizarre way to select players.

Btw it's Paterson not Patterson.

Edited by ErsatzThistle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ErsatzThistle said:

Genuine question but were you upset when we brought a young Manchester Utd player called Darren Flecther into the first team and kept him there after only a handful of appearances for his club ?

The amount of poxy "appearances at a high level" never tell the whole story. There's so much more to it than that. Players should never have to hit a "magic number" of appearances before playing international football. What an utterly bizarre way to select players.

Btw it's Paterson not Patterson.

Never have any problem with bringing in youth like Fletcher or Mctominay Tierney etc with next to no club experience. But surely if you haven't "made it" at club level by the age of 26 you will hardly become an international class player. He's found himself on the scene rather because we don't have a right back than he is a good one.

I think we have players that would run riot in the SPL at right back playing in other positions currently.

Before I get taken to court for suggesting playing some one out of position despite my comments elsewhere this is not the same as taking a quality player out of their usual position more a case of taking a better football player to cover one of our weakness's 

You are of course correct about the spelling but it's Callum that spells it wrong, credit to the lad though he has got two l's in Callum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, ceudmilefailte said:

Never have any problem with bringing in youth like Fletcher or Mctominay Tierney etc with next to no club experience. But surely if you haven't "made it" at club level by the age of 26 you will hardly become an international class player. He's found himself on the scene rather because we don't have a right back than he is a good one.

See this is the bit that intrigues me.

Could you (or anyone else who is interested) have a go at defining in one sentence what it means to have "made it at club level" ? Because I can't. It's too broad a term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, ErsatzThistle said:

See this is the bit that intrigues me.

Could you (or anyone else who is interested) have a go at defining in one sentence what it means to have "made it at club level" ? Because I can't. It's too broad a term.

To be seen as good enough to have played enough club football in an age related manner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×