Jump to content
Big Col

This weekends matches 2018/2019

Recommended Posts

Effectively the clubs are the SFA so throwing their toys out the pram about rules they make and officials they appoint doesn’t really make sense.

Whether Celtic felt they had to release a statement in response to some of the belters from Ibrox to pacify some of their support (were folk demanding they say something?) or they genuinely felt the need, I’m not sure. I suspect it was a response to statements from Rangers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RenfrewBlue said:

No idea Scotty. Not heard of them before. 

The 'Roman Catholic' version of the masons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Scotty CTA said:

The 'Roman Catholic' version of the masons.

I see. That explains why I haven't heard of them before. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, macy37 said:

Any arrests on Beatongate yet?

Have you tried the BBC for news? Or perhaps phoned Police Scotland? They'll know before we do. 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, RenfrewBlue said:

Have you tried the BBC for news? Or perhaps phoned Police Scotland? They'll know before we do. 👍

This type of supposed naughtiness is usually easy to solve who did it so I’m puzzled as to why there’s been no arrests as yet. The polis ain’t doing well. Funny that eh?

Edited by macy37

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, macy37 said:

This type of supposed naughtiness is usually easy to solve who did it so I’m puzzled as to why there’s been no arrests as yet. The polis ain’t doing well. Funny that eh?

I think it must the same polis working the case of that wee 10 year old boy who was hit by a bottle by Celtic fans at Hampden....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, macy37 said:

This type of supposed naughtiness is usually easy to solve who did it so I’m puzzled as to why there’s been no arrests as yet. The polis ain’t doing well. Funny that eh?

And why would it be easy to solve? If you u derstand the tech even just a wee tiny bit it's piss easy to send mobile messages that can't be traced back to a person. 

Don't believe all of the US cop shows that you watch. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RenfrewBlue said:

And why would it be easy to solve? If you u derstand the tech even just a wee tiny bit it's piss easy to send mobile messages that can't be traced back to a person. 

You really think the average punter who is sending abusive text messages to referees is smart enough for that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Tartan_McCole said:

You really think the average punter who is sending abusive text messages to referees is smart enough for that?

If you had someone's number it'd be piss easy to buy a PAYG phone for £15 and text someone threats. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Parklife said:

If you had someone's number it'd be piss easy to buy a PAYG phone for £15 and text someone threats. 

And if you know their address it's easy enough to post them something that would be very difficult to trace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Parklife said:

If you had someone's number it'd be piss easy to buy a PAYG phone for £15 and text someone threats. 

I'm not disputing how easy it is. I just doubt that a person texting a referee verbals has the common sense to cover his tracks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Tartan_McCole said:

I'm not disputing how easy it is. I just doubt that a person texting a referee verbals has the common sense to cover his tracks.

Seriously? Every US cop show explains how to do this. Even the knuckle draggers watch TV. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tartan_McCole said:

I'm not disputing how easy it is. I just doubt that a person texting a referee verbals has the common sense to cover his tracks.

Even easier to cover tracks when its not actually ever happened.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, macy37 said:

Even easier to cover tracks when its not actually ever happened.

 

Nah, Celtic fans have no previous of that whatsoever.

I saw his number getting chucked about Twitter so there is a very high chance some tit/tits have messaged him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn’t doubt it’s been slightly overplayed, but I doubt it’s completely fabricated.

Maybe it was macy on his burner cell and he’s taunting the feds?

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, macy37 said:

Even easier to cover tracks when its not actually ever happened.

 

Of course it didn't happen. Everyone is conspiring against Celtic, as usual. 

Let me know if you run out of tin foil when you're making your new hat. I've got loads left over from Christmas. It's the extra wide stuff too. 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, macy37 said:

No arrests yet? No??

Just to be clear, do you think this was completely made up? Exaggerated?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sbcmfc said:

Just to be clear, do you think this was completely made up? Exaggerated?

Not speaking for him but I personally don't believe he was given death threats. Probably abuse, which is still shite, but not death threats. So I think it was exaggerated.

I also believe he gave permission for it to be leaked, given it was his works number, to take the heat off him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Scotland Ever More said:

Not speaking for him but I personally don't believe he was given death threats. Probably abuse, which is still shite, but not death threats. So I think it was exaggerated.

I also believe he gave permission for it to be leaked, given it was his works number, to take the heat off him.

I agree with the 1st bit, think the 2nd bit is a stretch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, sbcmfc said:

I agree with the 1st bit, think the 2nd bit is a stretch.

Then I'd say you're very naive, no offence intended obviously.

Easy to change a telephone number, not so easy to answer questions about his terrible refereeing. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Scotland Ever More said:

Then I'd say you're very naive, no offence intended obviously.

Easy to change a telephone number, not so easy to answer questions about his terrible refereeing. 

 

If that's the case why haven't other refs done this before?

And since Macy didn't respond, I've still got that tin foil if you damage your current headgear. 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×