TDYER63 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 2 hours ago, Orraloon said: Seems like a nice day to be driving across the Irish sea. 8 minutes ago, Ally Bongo said: Alex Cole Hamilton would have a field day with the number of days it would be closed (That's if it wasnt complete horseshit and another deflection) Never fear. One of the options is a bridge, leading to a tunnel, then back to a bridge. No concerns at all, absolutely not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coldo Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 6 minutes ago, TDYER63 said: Never fear. One of the options is a bridge, leading to a tunnel, then back to a bridge. No concerns at all, absolutely not. To be fair, the Denmark-Sweden bridge is something similar to this. What I've found strange so far is that no one has mentioned that bridge is directly on the route for Sumbarmine access to the Atlantic. Don't think the MOD would be happy about this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mox Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 The last place I want us connected to is that hell hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alibi Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 As a civil engineer, I can't see this idea being viable at reasonable cost. There are a number of technical problems that are apparent even at a cursory glance. Firstly, who wants to get caught in the middle of that bridge when a storm hits? The Queensferry Crossing is a short bridge and you're only on it for a matter of minutes. A 20 mile long bridge would take at least 20 minutes to cross in decent weather conditions, probably more as it would be speed limited, probably to 50mph. Secondly, there is some pretty deep water in that area, around 1000 feet deep - that means massive towers to support the bridge, probably at least 1500 feet high overall. The idea of a bridge combined with a tunnel works well for the Oresund Bridge - I think the tunnel is maybe needed there due to proximity to Copenhagen Airport - but with the munitions rolling around in the area and blowing up every so often, a tunnel might be a risky idea. Leaving aside the technical problems, there is also the elephant in the room, the road network leading to Portpatrick. A new motorway would be needed from the Gretna area or maybe from Lockerbie to make sense of the idea. The A75 isn't really adequate for the current traffic with few dual carriageway sections and some sections that are roadblocks at times depending on when the ferries arrive at Cairnryan. Finally, would this bridge benefit Scotland? I am not so sure that it is Scotland that would reap the benefit. Ireland certainly could do with better connectivity, and it would be of great benefit to Northern Ireland in particular (soon to be part of the republic I would suggest). However Scotland needs to be better connected with mainland Europe and a bridge to Ireland wouldn't do that beyond the connection to Ireland itself. It might well be that an M75 through D&G would be great for our local economy as it's a rather difficult area to access at times, and that would be welcome, but it doesn't need a bridge in the far west to get those benefits. To me this is just Boris Johnson talking shite, pandering to the DUP maybe even though he's finished with them, and trying to deflect from the announcement that Scotland will be asked to pay for a high speed rail link that will never come anywhere near Scotland - when in fact high speed rail is of most benefit when it goes a long way as time savings are minimal for shorter journeys like London to Birmingham but more worthwhile for long distances, the likes of Aberdeen to Paris. Still waiting for direct trains to mainland Europe 30 years after the channel tunnel was opened... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErsatzThistle Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 When can we expect a statement from Ibrox regarding this ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDYER63 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 59 minutes ago, Coldo said: To be fair, the Denmark-Sweden bridge is something similar to this. What I've found strange so far is that no one has mentioned that bridge is directly on the route for Sumbarmine access to the Atlantic. Don't think the MOD would be happy about this? If only we had an oil fund with which to fund the project .....🙂 I doubt BJ has given much consideration to the MOD route at this stage, thats a very good point. He failed to build a garden bridge across the Thames but lets not let that detract from this good news day for UK transport links.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDange Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Just as polls showing support for Scottish independence is growing and Sinn Fein do well at Irish elections. Diversionary pish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 46 minutes ago, Alibi said: As a civil engineer, I can't see this idea being viable at reasonable cost. There are a number of technical problems that are apparent even at a cursory glance. Firstly, who wants to get caught in the middle of that bridge when a storm hits? The Queensferry Crossing is a short bridge and you're only on it for a matter of minutes. A 20 mile long bridge would take at least 20 minutes to cross in decent weather conditions, probably more as it would be speed limited, probably to 50mph. Secondly, there is some pretty deep water in that area, around 1000 feet deep - that means massive towers to support the bridge, probably at least 1500 feet high overall. The idea of a bridge combined with a tunnel works well for the Oresund Bridge - I think the tunnel is maybe needed there due to proximity to Copenhagen Airport - but with the munitions rolling around in the area and blowing up every so often, a tunnel might be a risky idea. Leaving aside the technical problems, there is also the elephant in the room, the road network leading to Portpatrick. A new motorway would be needed from the Gretna area or maybe from Lockerbie to make sense of the idea. The A75 isn't really adequate for the current traffic with few dual carriageway sections and some sections that are roadblocks at times depending on when the ferries arrive at Cairnryan. Finally, would this bridge benefit Scotland? I am not so sure that it is Scotland that would reap the benefit. Ireland certainly could do with better connectivity, and it would be of great benefit to Northern Ireland in particular (soon to be part of the republic I would suggest). However Scotland needs to be better connected with mainland Europe and a bridge to Ireland wouldn't do that beyond the connection to Ireland itself. It might well be that an M75 through D&G would be great for our local economy as it's a rather difficult area to access at times, and that would be welcome, but it doesn't need a bridge in the far west to get those benefits. To me this is just Boris Johnson talking shite, pandering to the DUP maybe even though he's finished with them, and trying to deflect from the announcement that Scotland will be asked to pay for a high speed rail link that will never come anywhere near Scotland - when in fact high speed rail is of most benefit when it goes a long way as time savings are minimal for shorter journeys like London to Birmingham but more worthwhile for long distances, the likes of Aberdeen to Paris. Still waiting for direct trains to mainland Europe 30 years after the channel tunnel was opened... This would actually be a great idea but... The comparisons that are being drawn with the Oresund Bridge aren't particularly relevant for the technical reasons you've mentioned but also at either side of the bridge you have major population centres, Copenhagen on the Danish side and Malmo on the Swedish side, with all that means in terms of people who would use it on a regular basis and also the access to the road and rail network on both sides. If you look at it from the Irish side it looks more appealing, the Irish end of the crossing would presumably be somewhere on either the North Down or South Antrim coasts, either side of Belfast Lough, so you are close to the major population centre on Belfast and while there would need to be some upgrade of roads, I guess your'e probably only talking about 10-20 miles to connect with the NI Motorway network. The Scottish side of the crossing is likely to be around Portpatrick - which is a beautiful place but miles from nowhere. To make this remotely feasible, you'd need motorway to connect to the M74/M6 at Gretna. That is currently a journey of 101 miles. It gets madder as they are talking about it being a combined road/rail bridge. So unless you also build a new rail-line of roughly the same distance from the west coast mainline then its extending the existing infrastructure, which is the Glasgow - Stranraer line, with possibly a freight spur on the existing single track line between Troon and Kilmarnock. That'n not just a case of an extension from Stranraer to Portpatrick, the current line is single track south of Girvan. This is nothing other than a political stunt, designed to deflect from some current problem or other and probably to be pulled out at some future IndyRef as an "incentive". Johnson will spend millions on it though - without even putting a spade in the ground - to prop this up just as he did with his ludicrous garden bridge project on which about £50 million was spent before Sadiq Khan binned it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 4 hours ago, aaid said: More like a million tons of munitions in the Beaufort Dyke . Wouldn't be at all surprised if there wasn't stuff from Sellafield down there as well. There is definitely nuclear waste down there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hertsscot Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Don't know about a bridge over the Irish Sea but is there any reason why there can't be a sleeper train down to London on a Saturday night? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Hertsscot said: Don't know about a bridge over the Irish Sea but is there any reason why there can't be a sleeper train down to London on a Saturday night? Wouldn't have thought there would be much demand for it. Sleepers are generally aimed at people going to of coming back from work. If there was demand, I'm sure they'd have a service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auchinyell Sox Change Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 6 hours ago, ErsatzThistle said: When can we expect a statement from Ibrox regarding this ? "huns across the ocean" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thplinth Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Hertsscot said: Don't know about a bridge over the Irish Sea but is there any reason why there can't be a sleeper train down to London on a Saturday night? I took the sleeper once but from London to Glasgow. I cant even remember why I did it. I think I thought it might be better than flying somehow. Madness. It wasnt. It was really expensive, you had to share a tiny bunk bed compartment with some random unless you paid extra, the toilets and services were average and upon arrival in Glasgow at 6am (or earlier) they woke you up with a screeching alarm through the intercom and basically told you to feck off. The sheets were like cardboard and it was a terrible nights kip. How is it these days? Edited February 11, 2020 by thplinth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 26 minutes ago, aaid said: Wouldn't have thought there would be much demand for it. Sleepers are generally aimed at people going to of coming back from work. If there was demand, I'm sure they'd have a service. For a fraction of the cost of HS2 you could put on a personal sleeper for Hertsscot every Saturday night until he retires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 I see the Oresund Bridge is closed because of failing iced as well. I'm sure that Alex Cole Hansen and Murdo Frasersson will be calling for the Prime Ministers of Denmark and Sweden to resign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ramy 1314 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 I prefer the Stenna Line. 8 cans of Magners. Did it in September. Belfast to Stranraar. Then bus to Buchanan station. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCTA Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 6 minutes ago, Big Ramy 1314 said: I prefer the Stenna Line. 8 cans of Magners. Did it in September. Belfast to Stranraar. Then bus to Buchanan station. Aye, but that’s fine if yer only paying a half fare...... 🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ramy 1314 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 17 minutes ago, WCTA said: Aye, but that’s fine if yer only paying a half fare...... 🙄 Agreed. I decided to fly to Belfast from Glasgow, 40 minutes. Way back I had the whole day. Left Belfast at 6am, in Glasgow by noon. I quite enjoyed it. Cannae even remember the cost of the ferry. Flight was £60.. Just got the joke ya prick..🖕🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newryrep Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Fair play to any on any of the news programmes discussing this with a straight face to paraphrase Lew Grade when lamenting that Raise the Titanic bankrupted his studio 'it would of been cheaper to lower the atlantic' Quite by a long shot the most stupid idea ever to eminate form those of a unionist persuasion so much so that if I were a unionist I would suspect it was a republican black ops used to discredit unionism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Jim Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Yon Denmark-Sweden bridge is busier, shorter, shallower and the toll is a wee bit more than 50p. A tunnel might be more practical than bridging that very deep trench (There is nothing there to hold up a bridge.), but would mean considerable length. Especially for a gentle slope for, say, a greener rail option (Boris? Haud ma sides 😄 ) So more expensive than the chunnel (£13m at 2015 prices if I remember and the £ is shit now). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alibi Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 11 hours ago, Grim Jim said: Yon Denmark-Sweden bridge is busier, shorter, shallower and the toll is a wee bit more than 50p. A tunnel might be more practical than bridging that very deep trench (There is nothing there to hold up a bridge.), but would mean considerable length. Especially for a gentle slope for, say, a greener rail option (Boris? Haud ma sides 😄 ) So more expensive than the chunnel (£13m at 2015 prices if I remember and the £ is shit now). I think you're out by a factor of at least 1000 there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Jim Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Oops! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Jim Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Was reading today that due to the depth, a pontoon bridge would be needed in part. Not sure I'd fancy driving over that in bad weather. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hertsscot Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 On 2/11/2020 at 7:32 PM, Toepoke said: For a fraction of the cost of HS2 you could put on a personal sleeper for Hertsscot every Saturday night until he retires. Can't see Johnson going for that one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 On 2/11/2020 at 9:53 PM, Grim Jim said: A tunnel might be more practical than bridging that very deep trench (There is nothing there to hold up a bridge.), but would mean considerable length. Especially for a gentle slope for, say, a greener rail option (Boris? Haud ma sides 😄 ) So more expensive than the chunnel (£13m at 2015 prices if I remember and the £ is shit now). Mentioned on the previous page it would be the world's deepest road tunnel. Either option would be remarkable engineering achievements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.