The_Dark_Knight

This was the post that Pete replied to: "I'm not surprised, to be honest. I knew a fair chunk of people would vote that we'd qualify... Didn't know that it was would so much, though. 86.48% think we'll be in the final. Cripes..." Where's the typo?

Honestly, I'm not going to look into it as much as others will. It's a waste of time. Suffice to say, bring on the WC qualifiers.

When did i make a typo?

Cats? Sorry. I can't remember.

Because: 1. We have no chance of winning the playoffs. 2. Blooding a handful of players from the various youth teams, as soon as possible, will be beneficial on the long term. I genuinely cannot wait till the playoffs are over and we can focus on the World Cup qualifers.

Bye.

You don't believe me? You don't believe that i think we have a 1 in 10,000 chance? Fair enough. Off the record: we have 0% chance. But since we're still in the playoffs, we have the tiniest percent of a chance. I doubt I could correctly recite anyone's username in this place, so I'm surprised how close I got. Fine. Spout nonsense all you like. I'd rather you put me on ignore than waste my time with stupid comments, to be honest with you. And it's not the first time you've said the "seeing into the future" thing. We have the smallest amount of chance as we arent very good at the moment. 25%-50%?!?! Jeez. OK. Fair enough. Yeah, well, "good luck in the padded cell" has a very different ring to it. Plus you say "narcissistic" like it's a bad thing.

You got it spot on, t'is my opinion. If you don't agree with it then tell me, straight-up, why you don't agree with it. Don't spout nonsence about me being to see into the future, etc. But yes, in my opinion we have a 00.01% chance of qualifying for Euro 2020. If others think differenty.. Good luck to them.

"I'm not surprised, to be honest. I knew a fair chunk of people would vote that we'd qualify... Didn't know that it was would so much, though." It makes perfect sense. Maybe it's you. Yes. You said to me that it must be good to be able to look into future, and I'M the one who is offensive. Right. How is suggesting that I can look into the future be a civil reply? You're the one who is being provocative.

Yeah. Obviously, you didn't. You said "Didn’t know that is was would so much, though” doesn’t make much sense. Would what?" You obviously didn't read the "qualify" part. I'd say so.

Actually, looking back on it, this is the post you replied to: "I'm not surprised, to be honest. I knew a fair chunk of people would vote that we'd qualify... Didn't know that it was would so much, though. " Why didn't you read the "qualify" part?

0:1 Denmark!

Didn't you read what i was replying to? Mrbiamoc said that he was surprised so many people think we'll win the playoffs. I said that i knew a fair chunk of people would think it, but not quite as much as there is. Perhaps you ought to read the origins of a conversations before you chime in. If you just read it from the middle, of course you're going to be confused It's not positivity. It's bordering on insanity.

Talking of Ireland... Tonight they have a back four, all of whom are now established EPL players: Docherty, Duffy, Egan, Stevens. I hope that we had such riches, soon.

Not only do I think it's grammatically correct and easy to read, the Hemingway editor also thinks it. I'm not sure what your point is. You claimed that I have a time machine, just because I said a fair chunk of people would vote that we'd qualify. I'm 99.99% certain. The 0.01% only exists because the playoffs are still to be played.

You're welcome. (I genuinely didn't think there were any women in this place)

Really? Try this website: http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ I typed my post in it, it got "grade 0", and then posted yours (the one that I'm replying to), and it got "grade 3". In other words, my post is easier to read and better written than yours.

Then no.

It would depend who the second anchorman was.

In fairness, I apologised in the post you quoted.

Which part of "Didn't know that it was would so much, though." don't you read?

Well said.

"Apologizes" can be used as much as "apologizes" can. One is USA and one is UK. Plus, have you ever heard of an autocorrect? See what I mean? Farcity is obsessed with me. The weird(er) thing is, I don't ever recall talking to him. And yet he's so petrified of my very existence that he thinks me a God. (Not that I blame him) I would be flattered if he wasn't a guy. On second thoughts, I wouldn't be, what kind of a woman would hang around a football forum with a bunch of dudes? "Big Bertha", comes to mind. *shudder* Apologizes to any lady who frequent this board. It was jest. I don't generalize. Highly doubt there's any ladies here, though.

Nice. So we clone McTominay? People know my thoughts about how I think we should set up defensively, so I'm not going to go there. If we can manage to do that, with McTominay in central midfield, given license to stretch his legs, I think there's something there. One thing is for sure, though, McGinn is better playing as a second striker than an anchorman.

Yes, i don't condone it, but I don't condemn it, either.