Taylor1996's Content - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Taylor1996

Member
  • Posts

    2,714
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Posts posted by Taylor1996

  1. Just now, ceudmilefailte said:

    Defining moment, he's worse than you if he doesn't admit he's as bad as you.

    When he posts in a thread, and I contribute zero to the thread, apart from insulting him, that's when I'll say that I'm as bad as him. 

  2. 9 minutes ago, ceudmilefailte said:

     

    Not sure who's worse than who in these childish spats.

    It would be nice to post without someone coming into the thread, to contribute nothing than to insult me.

     

  3. 1 minute ago, kumnio said:

     

    Well that lasted long. 😂😂

    You mentioned PMs, if you’re that interested, on you go 👍

    I'm done giving you attention on this thread, that you're trying to ruin. Sorry, do I have to make things simpler?

    Nah. Your game is squabbling on a posting board with an audience, hoping more people gang up on me. 

    You are so hard.

  4. Just now, kumnio said:

    You made it about you, same as every other thread on TA Related. 

    Call me whatever you like, everyone gets banned for calling you out, but you always escape. 

    Threating to take it to PM and whatever else 😂😂😂 get a grip of yourself, well you’re probably doing that anyway. 

    When did I make it about me? When I said that I have no interest?

    Technically, every single post in the history of posting boards is personal and about the person posting it.

    Yada yada.  

    Still waiting. Oh wait, you need an audience? Rhetorical. 

    Anyway. Back to topic, twit. ("I' is pronounced "a") I'm done giving you attention.

  5. 5 minutes ago, kumnio said:

    1, Your every post, your very existence, your attitude, your style. 

    2, as above

    3, there’s many more than half a dozen people who think you’re a &£(;££(&://)&

    Maybe if you weren’t you, you wouldn’t be treated like this. You are not a nice person, you’re a horrible little troll who is probably sitting cock in hand at the attention he is getting. So many people can’t be wrong, maybe if you grew up and tried to interact with people normally, you wouldn’t be treated like shit on a shoe. 

    Oh, please do get over yourself, you little (word that would get me banned, but itself correct, nonetheless)

    Not like it? Progress it onto PM, you internet hardman.

    This thread is about Billy Gilmour, you fucking twit. (The "i" is pronounced "a")

  6. 8 minutes ago, runningtings said:

    Honestly mate your patter on here is terrible.

    Just get behind the team and gies all peace.

    What patter? You mean... words?

    So, it's perfectly fine for someone to come in with no other intention than to call me a boring attention seeking troll?

    Aye, no.

  7. Just now, vanderark14 said:

    You'll watch it and enjoy it but you've no interest in it.

    Makes sense,  crack on pal. 

    Is the match on today?

    I did say "it might change tomorrow'.

    Reading helps.

  8. 2 minutes ago, kumnio said:

    You’re the most boring troll here, an aggressive little attention seeking bairn. Do everyone a favour and sod off for the 12th time. 

    Ok. First things first.

    What makes me boring? What have I said to be considered a troll/attention seeker?

    These are all tired cliches that you cannot back up with substantial evidence.

    Aggressive? Yeah. You have half a dozen people spending everyday for years chipping away at you and tell me if you wouldn't be a wee bit snippy.

  9. 1 minute ago, Malcolm said:


    the facts are that gilmour was playing table tennis with Andy Robertson in a now deleted video.  I think that counts as close contact unless they were playing with different balls.

    In the video Gilmour brushed past McGinn. There was contact.

  10. 1 hour ago, vanderark14 said:

    🤣🤣🤣🤣grow up man and enjoy the day tomorrow 

    Oh. I'll watch it, and enjoy it, no matter the result.

    Just a shame about what's happened.

  11. 4 minutes ago, kumnio said:

    I wish you would you absolute attention seeking arse. 

    "You wish I would"

    Ok. Indulge me. What do you want me to "change the record" about?

  12. If Stuart Armstrong plays in central midfield then we might as well give Croatia all three points.

    Armstrong, all he does is get his head down and dribble forward and more times than not, he loses possession. McGinn does that (and maintains possession), far better. Armstrong would be fine if we played with wingers or as a number 10 or a false 9. In other words, keep him the hell away from the center of midfield. 

    I now have zero interest in this match. It might change tomorrow. 

  13. 2 minutes ago, Mox said:

    Serious questions about the fairness of their table tennis match?

    Nah, the guy made a theoretical comment that they could've went to their room to phuck. I made a quip about it being expected (that they phucked)

    But if you have to explain a joke it probably wasn't delivered very well. I can do better. ;)

     

  14. As much as I love Scott McTominay, he doesn't stamp his authority in midfield as much as he could. He is a good midfielder, but he seems to be better in defence when he has more time on the ball.

    He hasn't played well in midfield for Scotland. 

    I have hope that McTominay will improve in that area. He needs a few one-on-one sessions with Roy Keane.

    If you compare his press-resistence to that of Gilmour, it's night and day. Gilmour can take the ball when a man is touch-tight.

    He's had a handful of matches where he has been excellent in midfield for United. But it's not consistent enough.

    As is it now, though, playing Robertson or Tierney in the double-pivot will give us balance.

  15. 2 minutes ago, ceudmilefailte said:

    In my opinion Mcginn drops from an 8+ to a 6 if you drop him back. sooner find a 7 to play beside Mcgregor

    Yeah. Totally how I would go, too.

    I don't 100% trust McGinn as a 6, but I certainly trust him more than McTominay, etc.

  16. 5 minutes ago, ceudmilefailte said:

    He's the only player in the squad that could pass the in the same sort of manner for 90 minutes, and demand as much of the ball.

    Yeah. I remember suggesting that (and being laughed at it) a number of years ago.

    He has the passing, the pressing, the energy, the presence as well as the quality.

    Steve Clarke has shown that he isn't afraid to think outside the box. So hopefully he tries this one.

    Or Tierney, if fit.

  17. 3 minutes ago, Tartan blood said:

    Obviously we all know Gilmour is potentially our best holding midfielder, but he's out, and we have to deal with it. All of those players I mentioned have different, but great qualities. Qualities that merited their inclusion in the squad. 

    We're inevitably going to have to shift some people around, unless Fleck is brought in, which I doubt.

    I'm trying to see the positives. An extra attacking player on the park might be exactly what we need. Though, as I said, I'd have preferred for the player dropped to be McGregor. But that decision has been forced upon us.

    I know.

    I applaud your optimism, mate.

    At the moment I'm in meltdown. At the minute I just can't see who will replace Gilmour.

    I don't trust Armstrong, so that's out. Maybe McGinn deep and Fraser just behind the strikers.

  18. Can some people here not just take one fucking day off?!

    We've taken a collective kick in the bollocks. But yeah fine, keep up with your bullying and harassment and paranoid  delusional bullshit.

  19. 3 minutes ago, TDYER63 said:

    🤣🤣 says the guy( or gal) with 3543 usernames. 
    Its very disappointing but not the end of the world. Log into one of your other profiles , one with a cheery disposition, and you will feel better  😁

     

    I have one username, a-*ole (that goes for all the paranoid army)

    Stfu.

  20. 1 hour ago, Tartan blood said:

    Armstrong, Christie, Fraser, Forrest, and Turnbull are all bloody good players. I'd be more than happy to see one of them included. And may well have started anyway. Though I'd have thought McGregor would be the one sacrificed, rather than Gilmour.

    Armstrong is a poor man's John McGinn. His modus operandi is get the ball, dip his head down and rampage forward like we did in primary school.

    The next three are attacking midfielders and Turnbull is way too wet behind-the-ears.

     

×
×
  • Create New...