bigfingers

He's not going to improve much if he ain't playing.

From the latest DR article it looks like gemmill wants to pick him and Clarke wants to pick him. Only natural I guess. I think he will be in both squads. Not sure when the under 21 game is though.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/billy-gilmour-set-scotland-u-21657987.amp

Its a tricky one and not a situation I have seen before. I would have him in the squad but I wouldn't start him.

Just want what's best for wee Billy.

Who has the final say??... Clarke, the SFA or gemmill?? They probably all have different opinions on it. Guess we'll find out tomorrow.

I actually think England will be a bit jealous that we have Gilmour. Typical Scotland. Always seeing the negatives of a positive.

We now have a player of genuine top level quality who will be in the squad for the next 15 years.

I'm just thinking of the bigger picture.

Realistic outlook.

There is plenty time to build a team round him. He's only 18 and still got 15 years left of his career. We don't have any friendlies and if he plays he would be thrown into an intense atmosphere. What happens if he doesn't perform to the same level as the past 2 games? Does he drop back to the under 21s?

He's getting called up for the under 21s.

The athletic and now daily record.

reading on twitter gilmour to remain in the under 21s for the time being.

Anyone know when it is likely the squad will be picked?