Ok, so you just repeated somebody else's selective stat. That's fair enough. That's what folk who use stats, to back up their argument, often rely on. They know that most folk will just take those stats at face value, and not bother to check the real significance of those stats.
I think Clarke is doing a good job and I'm not too bothered about friendly results. I'm sure he will be learning from them.
I don't really care whether folk are slagging him off, or think he is a god. I just like to point out when folk are manipulating stats to try to back up their argument.