Jump to content
Tartan Army Message Board

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, ParisInAKilt said:

Anyone still believe the offical story?

 

There's a special place in hell for you PIAK!!!! <_<

.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, brant grebner said:

Hard to believe it's been 19 years since it happened. Incredible how time flies.

Even more incredible how crime flies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone on here been banging on about chemtrails? That one is an absolute tin hat belter...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Flat Earth said:

Has anyone on here been banging on about chemtrails? That one is an absolute tin hat belter...

Image result for telly savalas capricorn one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been on FaceBook too long. I keep looking for the "like" button...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Flat Earth said:

Has anyone on here been banging on about chemtrails? That one is an absolute tin hat belter...

Don't think so. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, lesbattersby said:

Who was the poster who was convinced this is a conspiracy? Think he was based in Canada as i remember? 

ScottyCTA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, lesbattersby said:

Who was the poster who was convinced this is a conspiracy? Think he was based in Canada as i remember? 

That'll be Scotty!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

911 probably was a conspiracy, but the nonsense about it being a demolition job was made up to discredit the whole thing. A five hundred ton plane filled with tons of highly flammable fuel flew into it at about 400mph. You don't need to make up shit to explain why the things fell down. Unless you want to stop people asking valid questions about what we were all being distracted from.

Lockerbie is another one. A crash site 20 miles wide and the crucial piece of evidence was a 3mm piece of circuit board found in a forest by a CIA guy. Go out in your back garden and throw a 10p over your shoulder and then try and find it. Now imagine your back garden is the size of greater Glasgow. Aye right... Libya were stitched up. Lockerbie was retaliation for the Iran Air flight shot down by the USS Vincennes over the Straits of Hormuz, and it was very likely LIHOP. (Let it happen on purpose).

The 911 demolition nonsense, moon landing bollocks and chemtrails is purely to distract and discredit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Flat Earth said:

911 probably was a conspiracy, but the nonsense about it being a demolition job was made up to discredit the whole thing. A five hundred ton plane filled with tons of highly flammable fuel flew into it at about 400mph. You don't need to make up shit to explain why the things fell down. Unless you want to stop people asking valid questions about what we were all being distracted from.

Lockerbie is another one. A crash site 20 miles wide and the crucial piece of evidence was a 3mm piece of circuit board found in a forest by a CIA guy. Go out in your back garden and throw a 10p over your shoulder and then try and find it. Now imagine your back garden is the size of greater Glasgow. Aye right... Libya were stitched up. Lockerbie was retaliation for the Iran Air flight shot down by the USS Vincennes over the Straits of Hormuz, and it was very likely LIHOP. (Let it happen on purpose).

The 911 demolition nonsense, moon landing bollocks and chemtrails is purely to distract and discredit.

http://www.ae911truth.org/evidence.html 

Don't get me wrong, the point about deflection is a valid one but many an expect has questioned the offical cause of destruction. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Conspiracy theories for both the JFK assasination and 9/11 are exacerbated by the Government, CIA & FBI trying to cover their tracks so less blame was put on them for their monumental fvck ups and interactions with the perpetrators. 

Both could have easily been averted

That is not to say both were desired or allowed to happen by those agencies - unlike Lockerbie as FE highlighted.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think that's a key point about 911 being averted. The idea that one of the most heavily protected airspaces in the world could have been attacked like as in the offical narrative is more of a conspiracy theory than it being an inside job. 

Theres never been a thorough investigation into it, even those involved in the commission said it was set up to fail. 

Edited by ParisInAKilt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5654/debunking-911-myths-planes/

 

Claim: No fighter jets were scrambled from any of the 28 Air Force bases within close range of the four hijacked flights. "On 11 September Andrews had two squadrons of fighter jets with the job of protecting the skies over Washington D.C.," says the Web site emperors-clothes.com. "They failed to do their job." "There is only one explanation for this," writes Mark R. Elsis of StandDown.net. "Our Air Force was ordered to Stand Down on 9/11."

FACT: On 9/11 there were only 14 fighter jets on alert in the contiguous 48 states. No computer network or alarm automatically alerted the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) of missing planes. "They [civilian Air Traffic Control, or ATC] had to pick up the phone and literally dial us," says Maj. Douglas Martin, public affairs officer for NORAD. Boston Center, one of 22 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regional ATC facilities, called NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) three times: at 8:37 am EST to inform NEADS that Flight 11 was hijacked; at 9:21 am to inform the agency, mistakenly, that Flight 11 was headed for Washington (the plane had hit the North Tower 35 minutes earlier); and at 9:41 am to (erroneously) identify Delta Air Lines Flight 1989 from Boston as a possible hijacking. The New York ATC called NEADS at 9:03 am to report that United Flight 175 had been hijacked—the same time the plane slammed into the South Tower. Within minutes of that first call from Boston Center, NEADS scrambled two F-15s from Otis Air Force Base in Falmouth, Mass., and three F-16s from Langley Air National Guard Base in Hampton, Va. None of the fighters got anywhere near the pirated planes.

Why couldn't ATC find the hijacked flights? When the hijackers turned off the planes' transponders, which broadcast identifying signals, ATC had to search 4500 identical radar blips crisscrossing some of the country's busiest air corridors. And NORAD's sophisticated radar? It ringed the continent, looking outward for threats, not inward. "It was like a doughnut," Martin says. "There was no coverage in the middle." Pre-9/11, flights originating in the States were not seen as threats and NORAD wasn't prepared to track them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ally Bongo said:

Both could have easily been averted.

Only if the people 'at the top' wanted to piss off satan.

9/11 had been in the works for decades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ParisInAKilt said:

Think that's a key point about 911 being averted. The idea that one of the most heavily protected airspaces in the world could have been attacked like as in the offical narrative is more of a conspiracy theory than it being an inside job. 

Thing is, look at the history of warfare (and that's what 9/11 was really...war), and you'll find loads of examples of a new weapon (in this case passenger planes flown by suicidal pilots) completely outfoxing the enemy and doing damage never thought possible by the other side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chemtrails and moonlanding is howling at the moon.

There were explosives in both WTC, probably in the basement, too many folk heard them for it not to be true.

The real problem is it takes months to assimilate all the knowledge and then parse it into a narrative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to look at anything bar the Anthrax, once you know that timeline you know it was a set up. Once you find out that Atta didn't meet in Prague. Didn't get the Anthrax from Iraq, and it eventually turned out to be made in AMES America, total smoking gun. Someone in America with access to American made anthrax sent the packages, and knew other fake ones were getting sent as well. The reason they know is the first batch were sent, but due to it being holidays they went unopened for over a week, then other ones referencing the old ones were sent, yet no one knew the first ones had been sent yet cause of the delay in opening.

Pretty much everything is known, we know the names of the dancing israeli's, the names of the people with the fake I.D. for the WTC, that almost went to court, but the main witness was set on fire in her car and it crashed.

Katherine Smith (burnt to death in fire) was selling fake ID's and they got caught.

" The connection to Sept. 11 emerged when FBI agents found a visitor’s pass for the World Trade Center – dated Sept. 5 – in Hammad’s wallet. He claimed to be a plumber who had worked on the building’s sprinkler. "

http://nypost.com/2002/02/13/911-link-eyed-in-fiery-death-of-crooked-dmv-worker/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×