Mark Warburton - Resigned - Page 13 - Football related - Discussion of non TA football - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Mark Warburton - Resigned


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, sbcmfc said:

What happened to Frank de Boer?

:lol:

Never a serious candidate. Media putting two and two together and coming up with 894.

Caixinha is an intriguing appointment. Might be awful, might be shrewd. At least it's a deviation from the usual boring managerial merry-go-round.

Edited by thewolf_1980
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 334
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

3 minutes ago, thewolf_1980 said:

Never a serious candidate. Media putting two and two together and coming up with 894.

Caixinha is an intriguing appointment. Might be awful, might be shrewd. At least it's a deviation from the usual boring managerial merry-go-round.

Tend to agree with you there Wolfy. 

Radio Clyde phone in was hilarious last night. 

Some rocket came on and slagged off the appointment as he's got no track record. When asked he then admitted he knew nothing of Caixinha and wanted McLeish and Barry Ferguson instead! 

I thought the panel were going to do themselves an injury suppressing their laughter. 

Another caller thought it was a bad appointment because of Paul Le Guen. The only similarity they came up with was they are both foreign. They didn't like Dick Advocaat's name being brought up to prove them stupid. 

Some of the funniest stuff you could hope to hear. ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Flure said:

Well, Warburton wasn't Scottish. So, in football terms at least, wasn't he "foreign" too?

I think these particular rockets quite like anyone who is associated with the butchers apron. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, RenfrewBlue said:

I think these particular rockets quite like anyone who is associated with the butchers apron. 

For this comment you have just went on my very small "Rangers fan who isnae a Hun" list. :ok:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Stu101 said:

the amount payable has jumped all over the place too. Who knows...

His contract was up in April so doubt there's much compensation to pay, no matter who's paying it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RenfrewBlue said:

His contract was up in April so doubt there's much compensation to pay, no matter who's paying it. 

depends - normally the calculation is the term of the term of the contract

so if he was on GBP 2M a year - then 2 months of that is Circa GBP 300K  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, euan2020 said:

depends - normally the calculation is the term of the term of the contract

so if he was on GBP 2M a year - then 2 months of that is Circa GBP 300K  

According to the rumour mill he was on around 800k a year, so at most it'd be 1 sixth of that figure. So £130k ish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Toepoke said:

Caixinha confirmed as manager on a 3 year deal...

3-yr deal?

Don't Celtic managers operate on a rolling 1-yr contract?

It limits the employers liability in the event of a sacking leading to a compensation situation, and it protects the employee giving a 1-yr compensation.

But a 3-yr deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Flure said:

3-yr deal?

Don't Celtic managers operate on a rolling 1-yr contract?

It limits the employers liability in the event of a sacking leading to a compensation situation, and it protects the employee giving a 1-yr compensation.

But a 3-yr deal?

But it's Rangers. Nothing should surprise us anymore about their clever financial management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Flure said:

3-yr deal?

Don't Celtic managers operate on a rolling 1-yr contract?

It limits the employers liability in the event of a sacking leading to a compensation situation, and it protects the employee giving a 1-yr compensation.

But a 3-yr deal?

Their managers aren't sacked. They are resigned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Flure said:

3-yr deal?

Don't Celtic managers operate on a rolling 1-yr contract?

It limits the employers liability in the event of a sacking leading to a compensation situation, and it protects the employee giving a 1-yr compensation.

But a 3-yr deal?

Which may have a notice or termination clause limiting any pay off. We don't know but I'm sure that won't stop the usual nonsense getting trotted out.. 0 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RenfrewBlue said:

Which may have a notice or termination clause limiting any pay off. We don't know but I'm sure that won't stop the usual nonsense getting trotted out.. 0 

That's true. Hadn't thought of that.

But what would be the point of signing a 3-yr deal if you could get sacked with only (for the sake of argument) one month's compen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Flure said:

That's true. Hadn't thought of that.

But what would be the point of signing a 3-yr deal if you could get sacked with only (for the sake of argument) one month's compen?

Doubt it would be as little as a month but could be limited to a maximum amount maybe. 

There's any number of ways to structure that kind of clause. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, RenfrewBlue said:

Doubt it would be as little as a month but could be limited to a maximum amount maybe. 

There's any number of ways to structure that kind of clause. 

No, it wouldn't be a month. I was using that as an extreme.

Let's say it was limited to 12 months. What would be the point of signing a 3-yr deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Flure said:

No, it wouldn't be a month. I was using that as an extreme.

Let's say it was limited to 12 months. What would be the point of signing a 3-yr deal?

The length of contract is probably more symbolic these days. Let's face it, 5 or 6 bad results and most managers get binned anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Flure said:

No, it wouldn't be a month. I was using that as an extreme.

Let's say it was limited to 12 months. What would be the point of signing a 3-yr deal?

 
 

It could be in case he's a success and gets tempted by "riches" elsewhere then Rangers would get some compensation if he wanted to leave, but on the whole it's pointless speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Larky Masher said:

It could be in case he's a success and gets tempted by "riches" elsewhere then Rangers would get some compensation if he wanted to leave, but on the whole it's pointless speculation.

Oh, that's a very good point. Hadn't thought of the compen from the employer's angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



×
×
  • Create New...